I have a git superproject that references several submodules and I am trying to lock down a workflow for the rest of the my project members to work within.
For this question, lets say my superproject is called supery
and the submodule is called subby
. (Then is a simplification of what I'm trying to do...I'm not actually using the branches for versions, but I thought it would be easiest to lay out as a question.)
My master branch of supery
has the tag v1.0
of the git project subby
referenced as a submodule. The branch of supery
called one.one
and changed the reference of the submodule to point to the tag v1.1
of subby
.
I can work within each of these branches without a hitch, but if I try to update the one.one
branch with changes from the master
branch I receive some conflicts and I don't how to resolve them.
Basically after running a git pull . master
while in the subby
branch, it looks like it creates additional submodules.
Before the pull/merge, I get the desired response from git submodule
from the one.one
branch:
$ git checkout master
$ git submodule
qw3rty...321e subby (v1.0)
$ git checkout one.one
$ git submodule
asdfgh...456d subby (v1.1)
But after the pull, it adds additional submodules when I run git submodule
:
$ git pull . master
Auto-merged schema
CONFLICT (submodule): Merge conflict in subby - needs qu3rty...321e
Automatic merge failed; fix conflicts and then commit the results.
$ git submodule
qw3rty...321e subby (v1.0)
asdfgh...456d subby (v1.1)
zxcvbn...7890 subby (v1.1~1)
How do I delete/ignore the unwanted submodule references and commit my conflicts and changes? Or is there a parameter I can use with my original git pull
that will ignore my submodules?
Got help from this discussion. In my case the
worked for me :)
I had this problem with
git rebase -i origin/master
to a branch. I wanted to take master's version of the submodule ref, so I simply did:git reset master path/to/submodule
and then
git rebase --continue
That solved the problem for me.
Well In my parent directory I see:
So I just did this
I struggled a bit with the answers on this question and didn't have much luck with the answers in a similar SO post either. So this is what worked for me - bearing in mind that in my case, the submodule was maintained by a different team, so the conflict came from different submodule versions in master and my local branch of the project I was working on:
git status
- make a note of the submodule folder with conflictsReset the submodule to the version that was last committed in the current branch:
git reset HEAD path/to/submodule
At this point, you have a conflict-free version of your submodule which you can now update to the latest version in the submodule's repository:
And now you can
commit
that and get back to work.I have not seen that exact error before. But I have a guess about the trouble you are encountering. It looks like because the
master
andone.one
branches ofsupery
contain different refs for thesubby
submodule, when you merge changes frommaster
git does not know which ref -v1.0
orv1.1
- should be kept and tracked by theone.one
branch ofsupery
.If that is the case, then you need to select the ref that you want and commit that change to resolve the conflict. Which is exactly what you are doing with the reset command.
This is a tricky aspect of tracking different versions of a submodule in different branches of your project. But the submodule ref is just like any other component of your project. If the two different branches continue to track the same respective submodule refs after successive merges, then git should be able to work out the pattern without raising merge conflicts in future merges. On the other hand you if switch submodule refs frequently you may have to put up with a lot of conflict resolving.
Well, its not technically managing conflicts with submodules (ie: keep this but not that), but I found a way to continue working...and all I had to do was pay attention to my
git status
output and reset the submodules:That would reset the submodule to the pre-pull commit. Which in this case is exactly what I wanted. And in other cases where I need the changes applied to the submodule, I'll handle those with the standard submodule workflows (checkout master, pull down the desired tag, etc).