How to generate a random number between a and b in

2019-01-30 04:32发布

To generate a random number between 3 and 10, for example, I use: rand(8) + 3

Is there a nicer way to do this (something like rand(3, 10)) ?

8条回答
叛逆
2楼-- · 2019-01-30 04:54

Just note the difference between the range operators:

3..10  # includes 10
3...10 # doesn't include 10
查看更多
太酷不给撩
3楼-- · 2019-01-30 04:56

And here is a quick benchmark for both #sample and #rand:

irb(main):014:0* Benchmark.bm do |x|
irb(main):015:1*   x.report('sample') { 1_000_000.times { (1..100).to_a.sample } }
irb(main):016:1>   x.report('rand') { 1_000_000.times { rand(1..100) } }
irb(main):017:1> end
       user     system      total        real
sample  3.870000   0.020000   3.890000 (  3.888147)
rand  0.150000   0.000000   0.150000 (  0.153557)

So, doing rand(a..b) is the right thing

查看更多
叼着烟拽天下
4楼-- · 2019-01-30 04:58
def random_int(min, max)
    rand(max - min) + min
end
查看更多
Emotional °昔
5楼-- · 2019-01-30 04:59
Random.new.rand(a..b) 

Where a is your lowest value and b is your highest value.

查看更多
\"骚年 ilove
6楼-- · 2019-01-30 05:00

UPDATE: Ruby 1.9.3 Kernel#rand also accepts ranges

rand(a..b)

http://www.rubyinside.com/ruby-1-9-3-introduction-and-changes-5428.html

Converting to array may be too expensive, and it's unnecessary.


(a..b).to_a.sample

Or

[*a..b].sample

Array#sample

Standard in Ruby 1.8.7+.
Note: was named #choice in 1.8.7 and renamed in later versions.

But anyway, generating array need resources, and solution you already wrote is the best, you can do.

查看更多
Fickle 薄情
7楼-- · 2019-01-30 05:06
rand(3..10)

Kernel#rand

When max is a Range, rand returns a random number where range.member?(number) == true.

查看更多
登录 后发表回答