Many python IDE's will start you with a template like:
print 'hello world'
That's not enough... So here's my skeleton code to get this question started:
My Module Skeleton, Short Version:
#!/usr/bin/env python
"""
Module Docstring
"""
#
## Code goes here.
#
def test():
"""Testing Docstring"""
pass
if __name__=='__main__':
test()
and,
My Module Skeleton, Long Version:
#!/usr/bin/env python
# -*- coding: ascii -*-
"""
Module Docstring
Docstrings: http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0257/
"""
__author__ = 'Joe Author (joe.author@website.org)'
__copyright__ = 'Copyright (c) 2009-2010 Joe Author'
__license__ = 'New-style BSD'
__vcs_id__ = '$Id$'
__version__ = '1.2.3' #Versioning: http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0386/
#
## Code goes here.
#
def test():
""" Testing Docstring"""
pass
if __name__=='__main__':
test()
Notes (PEP 8, UTF-8):
"""
===MODULE TYPE===
Since the vast majority of my modules are "library" types, I have constructed
this example skeleton as such. For modules that act as the main entry for
running the full application, you would make changes such as running a main()
function instead of the test() function in __main__.
===VERSIONING===
The following practice, specified in PEP 8, no longer makes sense:
__version__ = '$Revision: 1.2.3 $'
For two reasons:
(1) Distributed version control systems make it neccessary to include more
than just a revision number. E.g. author name and revision number.
(2) It's a revision number not a version number.
Instead, the __vcs_id__ variable is being adopted. This expands to, for
example:
__vcs_id__ = '$Id: example.py,v 1.1.1.1 2001/07/21 22:14:04 goodger Exp $'
===VCS DATE===
Likewise, the date variable has been removed:
__date__ = '$Date: 2009/01/02 20:19:18 $'
===CHARACTER ENCODING===
If the coding is explicitly specified, then it should be set to the default
setting of ASCII. This can be modified if necessary (rarely in practice).
Defaulting to UTF-8 can cause anomalies with editors that have poor unicode
support.
"""
Alternate Skeleton, Long Version:
(Code adapted from DasIch's answer.)
#!/usr/bin/env python
# -*- coding: ascii -*-
"""
package.module
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
A description which can be long and explain the complete
functionality of this module even with indented code examples.
Class/Function however should not be documented here.
:copyright: year by my name, see AUTHORS for more details
:license: license_name, see LICENSE for more details
"""
#
## Code goes here.
#
def test():
""" """
pass
if __name__=='__main__':
test()
There are a lot of PEPs that put forward coding style recommendations. Am I missing any important best practices? What is the best Python module skeleton code?
Update
Show me any kind of "best" that you prefer. Tell us what metrics you used to qualify "best".
I would say the best is the simplest one than satisfies your requirements. The more data you put to the 'skeleton' the more outdated or meaningless or mistaken data you may get there.
if __name__=='__main__':
part is not needed in a module that is just a module. Tests may be part of the module, but even then they could be called externally. Calling a module directly is often plain inconvenient (or impossible, e.g. when relative imports are used).The reasonable minimum IMHO is the docstring at the beginning of the module. Other pieces, mentioned in your question and other answers are also often useful, but are in no way obligatory.
Depending on the nature of the program, you could consider choosing a license and putting it at the start of the file.
Modules aren't executable, so they shouldn't have a shebang.
Docstrings are good.
Coding is useful.
Metadata such as author, copyright, version and license as best stored in the
setup.py
as part of the packaging metadata. The usage of__(metadata)__
module attributes is an outdated practice, as it predates the time when Python had packaging metadata. If the code is of an ephemeral enough nature not to warrant packaging, then it's unlikley that you're going to need any of the metadata.Additional features such as test() or a
__main__
hack I don't use nearly enough to warrant inclusion in a module template.So the only template needed is:
Nice and simple.
How about:
Then of course you modify that skeleton main to reflect actual parameters of the program (after the filename):
(Surprised we can't use Markdown in comments...)
Returning something is a best practice too (here with called args):
But it's becoming more complex than a simple "hello world".
The module may or may not contain a
main
function so that's not part of the template.