Allow user to set up an SSH tunnel, but nothing el

2019-01-29 18:16发布

I'd like to allow a user to set up an SSH tunnel to a particular machine on a particular port (say, 5000), but I want to restrict this user as much as possible. (Authentication will be with public/private keypair).

I know I need to edit the relevant ~/.ssh/authorized_keys file, but I'm not sure exactly what content to put in there (other than the public key).

标签: unix ssh
10条回答
看我几分像从前
2楼-- · 2019-01-29 18:32

On Ubuntu 11.10, I found I could block ssh commands, sent with and without -T, and block scp copying, while allowing port forwarding to go through.

Specifically I have a redis-server on "somehost" bound to localhost:6379 that I wish to share securely via ssh tunnels to other hosts that have a keyfile and will ssh in with:

$ ssh -i keyfile.rsa -T -N -L 16379:localhost:6379 someuser@somehost

This will cause the redis-server, "localhost" port 6379 on "somehost" to appear locally on the host executing the ssh command, remapped to "localhost" port 16379.

On the remote "somehost" Here is what I used for authorized_keys:

cat .ssh/authorized_keys   (portions redacted)

no-pty,no-X11-forwarding,permitopen="localhost:6379",command="/bin/echo do-not-send-commands" ssh-rsa rsa-public-key-code-goes-here keyuser@keyhost

The no-pty trips up most ssh attempts that want to open a terminal.

The permitopen explains what ports are allowed to be forwarded, in this case port 6379 the redis-server port I wanted to forward.

The command="/bin/echo do-not-send-commands" echoes back "do-not-send-commands" if someone or something does manage to send commands to the host via ssh -T or otherwise.

From a recent Ubuntu man sshd, authorized_keys / command is described as follows:

command="command" Specifies that the command is executed whenever this key is used for authentication. The command supplied by the user (if any) is ignored.

Attempts to use scp secure file copying will also fail with an echo of "do-not-send-commands" I've found sftp also fails with this configuration.

I think the restricted shell suggestion, made in some previous answers, is also a good idea. Also, I would agree that everything detailed here could be determined from reading "man sshd" and searching therein for "authorized_keys"

查看更多
Root(大扎)
3楼-- · 2019-01-29 18:36

Besides authorized_keys option like no-X11-forwarding, there actually is exactly one you are asking for: permitopen="host:port". By using this option, the user may only set up a tunnel to the specified host and port.

For the details of the AUTHORIZED_KEYS file format refer to man sshd.

查看更多
啃猪蹄的小仙女
4楼-- · 2019-01-29 18:39

Here you have a nice post that I found useful: http://www.ab-weblog.com/en/creating-a-restricted-ssh-user-for-ssh-tunneling-only/

The idea is: (with the new restricted username as "sshtunnel")

useradd sshtunnel -m -d /home/sshtunnel -s /bin/rbash
passwd sshtunnel

Note that we use rbash (restricted-bash) to restrict what the user can do: the user cannot cd (change directory) and cannot set any environment variables.

Then we edit the user's PATH env variable in /home/sshtunnel/.profile to nothing - a trick that will make bash not find any commands to execute:

PATH=""

Finally we disallow the user to edit any files by setting the following permissions:

chmod 555 /home/sshtunnel/
cd /home/sshtunnel/
chmod 444 .bash_logout .bashrc .profile
查看更多
唯我独甜
5楼-- · 2019-01-29 18:44

My solution is to provide the user who only may be tunneling, without an interactive shell, to set that shell in /etc/passwd to /usr/bin/tunnel_shell.

Just create the executable file /usr/bin/tunnel_shell with an infinite loop.

#!/bin/bash
trap '' 2 20 24
clear
echo -e "\r\n\033[32mSSH tunnel started, shell disabled by the system administrator\r\n"
while [ true ] ; do
sleep 1000
done
exit 0

Fully explained here: http://blog.flowl.info/2011/ssh-tunnel-group-only-and-no-shell-please/

查看更多
登录 后发表回答