I'd like to make a Python package containing some Cython code. I've got the the Cython code working nicely. However, now I want to know how best to package it.
For most people who just want to install the package, I'd like to include the .c
file that Cython creates, and arrange for setup.py
to compile that to produce the module. Then the user doesn't need Cython installed in order to install the package.
But for people who may want to modify the package, I'd also like to provide the Cython .pyx
files, and somehow also allow for setup.py
to build them using Cython (so those users would need Cython installed).
How should I structure the files in the package to cater for both these scenarios?
The Cython documentation gives a little guidance. But it doesn't say how to make a single setup.py
that handles both the with/without Cython cases.
The easiest is to include both but just use the c-file? Including the .pyx file is nice, but it's not needed once you have the .c file anyway. People who want to recompile the .pyx can install Pyrex and do it manually.
Otherwise you need to have a custom build_ext command for distutils that builds the C file first. Cython already includes one. http://docs.cython.org/src/userguide/source_files_and_compilation.html
What that documentation doesn't do is say how to make this conditional, but
Should handle it.
All other answers either rely on
Cython.Build
, which creates a chicken-and-egg problem between requiring cython viasetup_requires
and importing it.A modern solution is to use setuptools instead, see this answer (automatic handling of Cython extensions requires setuptools 18.0, i.e., it's available for many years already). A modern standard
setup.py
with requirements handling, an entry point, and a cython module could look like this:Including (Cython) generated .c files are pretty weird. Especially when we include that in git. I'd prefer to use setuptools_cython. When Cython is not available, it will build an egg which has built-in Cython environment, and then build your code using the egg.
A possible example: https://github.com/douban/greenify/blob/master/setup.py
Update(2017-01-05):
Since
setuptools 18.0
, there's no need to usesetuptools_cython
. Here is an example to build Cython project from scratch withoutsetuptools_cython
.I've done this myself now, in a Python package
simplerandom
(BitBucket repo - EDIT: now github) (I don't expect this to be a popular package, but it was a good chance to learn Cython).This method relies on the fact that building a
.pyx
file withCython.Distutils.build_ext
(at least with Cython version 0.14) always seems to create a.c
file in the same directory as the source.pyx
file.Here is a cut-down version of
setup.py
which I hope shows the essentials:I also edited
MANIFEST.in
to ensure thatmycythonmodule.c
is included in a source distribution (a source distribution that is created withpython setup.py sdist
):I don't commit
mycythonmodule.c
to version control 'trunk' (or 'default' for Mercurial). When I make a release, I need to remember to do apython setup.py build_ext
first, to ensure thatmycythonmodule.c
is present and up-to-date for the source code distribution. I also make a release branch, and commit the C file into the branch. That way I have a historical record of the C file that was distributed with that release.The simple hack I came up with:
Just install Cython if it could not be imported. One should probably not share this code, but for my own dependencies it's good enough.
Adding to Craig McQueen's answer: see below for how to override the
sdist
command to have Cython automatically compile your source files before creating a source distribution.That way your run no risk of accidentally distributing outdated
C
sources. It also helps in the case where you have limited control over the distribution process e.g. when automatically creating distributions from continuous integration etc.