How to force garbage collection in Java?

Question

Is it possible to force garbage collection in Java, even if it is tricky to do? I know about System.gc(); and Runtime.gc(); but they only suggest to do GC. How can I force GC?

Answer 1

YES it is almost possible to forced you have to call to methods in the same order and at the same time this ones are:

System.gc ();
System.runFinalization ();

even if is just one object to clean the use of this two methods at the same time force the garbage collector to use the finalise() method of unreachable object freeing the memory assigned and doing what the finalize() method states.

HOWEVER it is a terrible practice to use the garbage collector because the use of it could introduce an over load to the software that may be even worst than on the memory, the garbage collector has his own thread which is not possible to control plus depending on the algorithm used by the gc could take more time and is consider very inefficient, you should check your software if it worst with the help of the gc because it is definitely broke, a good solution must not depend on the gc.

NOTE: just to keep on mind this will works only if in the finalize method is not a reassignment of the object, if this happens the object will keep alive an it will have a resurrection which is technically possible.

Answer 2

The best (if not only) way to force a GC would be to write a custom JVM. I believe the Garbage collectors are pluggable so you could probably just pick one of the available implementations and tweak it.

Note: This is NOT an easy answer.

Answer 3

.gc is a candidate for elimination in future releases - a Sun Engineer once commented that maybe fewer than twenty people in the world actually know how to use .gc() - I did some work last night for a few hours on a central / critical data-structure using SecureRandom generated data, at somewhere just past 40,000 objects the vm would slow down as though it had run out of pointers. Clearly it was choking down on 16-bit pointer tables and exhibited classic "failing machinery" behavior.

I tried -Xms and so on, kept bit twiddling until it would run to about 57,xxx something. Then it would run gc going from say 57,127 to 57,128 after a gc() - at about the pace of code-bloat at camp Easy Money.

Your design needs fundamental re-work, probably a sliding window approach.