I have this code:
import re
def doReplace(toReplace):
i = 1
def chapterReplacer(_):
result = 'Chapter %i' % i
i += 1
return result
return re.sub('Chapter [a-zA-Z]+', chapterReplacer, test)
test = 'Chapter one Chapter Two Chapter three'
print doReplace(test)
when I run it, I get the following error:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "C:/Python26/replace.py", line 13, in <module>
print doReplace(test)
File "C:/Python26/replace.py", line 10, in doReplace
return re.sub('Chapter [a-zA-Z]+', chapterReplacer, test)
File "C:\Python26\lib\re.py", line 151, in sub
return _compile(pattern, 0).sub(repl, string, count)
File "C:/Python26/replace.py", line 6, in chapterReplacer
result = 'Chapter %i' % i
UnboundLocalError: local variable 'i' referenced before assignment
I was under the impression that chapterReplacer would capture the local variable i, but that doesn't seem to be happening?
In Python, if you assign to variable inside a function (even if with a compound assignment operator such as
+=
), that variable is considered local unless specified otherwise by aglobal
ornonlocal
statement.You can make
i
a function attributeEDIT: As of python 3, you can use
nonlocal
a la @MartijnPieters 's solution.Nope, and in python 2 you can't at all without resorting to using tricks with mutables:
Normally, python will only look in the surrounding scope for a variable if it is not being assigned to locally; as soon as the bytecompiler sees a direct assignment (
i = something
) and noglobal i
statement to persuade it otherwise, a variable is considered local.But in the above code we never assign to
i
in thechapterReplacer
function. Yes, we do changei[0]
but the value stored ini
itself, a list, does not change.In python 3, just use the
nonlocal
statement to have python look in it's closure for the variable:When compiler sees that variable
i
gets another value inside functionchapterReplacer
it treats it as local, and no 'closure magic' is applied. If you remove linei += 1
, your code will run.