Consider the following class
definition and deduction guide:
template <typename... Ts>
struct foo : Ts...
{
template <typename... Us>
foo(Us&&... us) : Ts{us}... { }
};
template <typename... Us>
foo(Us&&... us) -> foo<Us...>;
If I try to instantiate foo
with explicit template arguments, the code compiles correctly:
foo<bar> a{bar{}}; // ok
If I try to instantiate foo
through the deduction guide...
foo b{bar{}};
g++7 produces a compiler error:
prog.cc: In instantiation of 'foo<Ts>::foo(Us ...) [with Us = {bar}; Ts = {}]': prog.cc:15:16: required from here prog.cc:5:27: error: mismatched argument pack lengths while expanding 'Ts' foo(Us... us) : Ts{us}... { } ^~~
clang++5 explodes:
#0 0x0000000001944af4 PrintStackTraceSignalHandler(void*) (/opt/wandbox/clang-head/bin/clang-5.0+0x1944af4) #1 0x0000000001944dc6 SignalHandler(int) (/opt/wandbox/clang-head/bin/clang-5.0+0x1944dc6) #2 0x00007fafb639a390 __restore_rt (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0+0x11390) #3 0x0000000003015b30 clang::Decl::setDeclContext(clang::DeclContext*) (/opt/wandbox/clang-head/bin/clang-5.0+0x3015b30) ... clang-5.0: error: unable to execute command: Segmentation fault
While clang++ is definitely bugged (reported as issue #32673), is g++ correct in rejecting my code? Is my code ill-formed?
To simplify your example further, it appears that GCC does not implement variadic template arguments in deduction guides:
https://wandbox.org/permlink/4YsacnW9wYcoceDH
I didn't see any explicit mention of variadic templates in the wording for deduction guides in the standard or on cppreference.com. I see no interpretation of the standard that disallows this. Therefore I think this is a bug.