I very well know that it can be done with the help of interfaces and i have done it many times. But this time my situation is quite difference. I have class A
, class B
and i need to create another class C
which extends both A and B because C should have boths functionality and also note that A and B are not inter related so even i cant say A may extend class B
.
I am quite confused what should i do right now. I know we cant change java... but at least there would be some way possible. Even the nearest may also do... please help me out.
Adding more details:- Class B
is a standard API while class A
is a common exception class that need to be inherited by all exception classes.
Related question:
- Why is there no multiple inheritance in Java, but implementing multiple interfaces is allowed? (though my question above is not about why it's not allowed.)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adapter_pattern
Your problem is solved by the adapter pattern. I went back to check the wiki document, just to be sure :)
It is not possible to extend two classes, and thus inherit functionality from both, in Java. Your easiest alternative it to "wrap" at least one of the two classes. So, instead of also extending B you can have an instance of B inside C, and declare each of B's methods on C, and pass them through. C would not "be" a B, but it sounds like you just want to inherit functionality. And if that's true of A too, then, well, you should be using this pattern for both A and B and not extending either.
Maybe you can create a new class D, and have both class A and class B inherit from D?
Change the way you are thinking. Think in interfaces. It means that class A is actually an implementation of interface A' and class B is an implementation of interface B'. And you actually want a class C that implements both interfaces A' and B'. Class C doesn't need to extend anything or to use any particular pattern or whatsoever. It can extend A and delegate some methods to B, or it can extend B and delegate some methods to A. Or it can delegate all methods to A and B - implementation is your decision.
Make use of composition. Class C will contain an instance each of classes A and B.
You may try create
class C
that will contain one instance ofclass A
and one ofclass B
and their methods (create methods with same names that will just call methods fromA
andB
), it's called Composition - another method in opposite to inheritance. Of course that's in case if you don't needinstanceof
to work with thatC
class.