This is a problem I come across often. The following examples illustrates it:
struct A {
int m_SomeNumber;
};
struct B {
B( A & RequiredObject );
private:
A & m_RequiredObject;
};
struct C {
C( );
private:
A m_ObjectA;
B m_ObjectB;
};
The implementation of the constructor of C
looks something like this:
C::C( )
: B( m_ObjectA )
{ }
Since the order of initialization is not defined, m_ObjectA
might be uninitialized when the constructor of m_ObjectB
is called, resulting in undefined behavior. One way to force a certain order of initialization would be to make the members pointers and initialize them in the constructor body, thus forcing the correct order, but this is ugly for several reasons. Is there any way to force a certain initializtion order using the initialization-list of the constructor? If not, do you have any other suggestions how to handle this.
On the contrary, it is well-defined. The order of initialization is equal to the order in which the member variables are declared in your class (and that’s regardless of the actual order of the initialization list! It’s therefore a good idea to let the initialization list order match the order of the declarations to avoid nasty surprises).