PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER inside C++ member functi

2019-01-26 13:25发布

class A {
    public:
        A();
    private:
        pthread_mutex_t mu;
};

A::A()
{
    mu = PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER;  //cannot compile
}

Can't I initialize pthread_mutex_t inside a class member function?

标签: c++ pthreads
3条回答
等我变得足够好
2楼-- · 2019-01-26 13:31

Instead of this:

A::A()
{
    mu = PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER;  //cannot compile
}

Try this:

A::A()
{
pthread_mutex_init( &(mu), NULL);
}

The PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER is a macro,a C struct initializer for something like {0,0,0,0,0{0}} and can only be used at the point of definition.

查看更多
在下西门庆
3楼-- · 2019-01-26 13:38

Even if we change this to use an initializer list in the constructor it still fails:

#include <pthread.h>

struct foo {
  pthread_mutex_t test;
  foo() : test(PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER) {}
};

int main() {
  foo f;
}

We can see why it fails and an only be used for initialisation in a few contexts by looking at the output from the pre-processsor:

struct foo {
  pthread_mutex_t test;
  foo() : test({ { 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, { 0 } } }) {}
};

It's not legal to use nested braces for initialisation like that in C++03, but what's more interesting perhaps is that C++11 makes this syntax and usage perfectly legal.

In your original code we can see a few more things:

A::A()
{
    const pthread_mutex_t test = PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER; //  initialization - fine
    mu = test; // assignment - fine
    mu = PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER;  // assignment - C++11 only
}
查看更多
三岁会撩人
4楼-- · 2019-01-26 13:57

Use pthread_mutex_init in this case, as the constant is for compile-time initialization.

查看更多
登录 后发表回答