I've been using nsenter for the last few months to get a shell running on a container for debugging purposes. I have heard about and used docker exec which was introduced in version 1.3. Docker exec seems to be the new best practice for the purpose of getting inside a container for debugging purposes, but I'm wondering if there are any drawbacks to using docker exec versus nsenter. Information comparing the two is scant. Are there any specific problems I should watch out for or avoid when using docker exec
versus nsenter?
相关问题
- Docker task in Azure devops won't accept "$(pw
- Unable to run mariadb when mount volume
- Unspecified error (0x80004005) while running a Doc
- What would prevent code running in a Docker contai
- How to reload apache in php-apache docker containe
That is not entirely clear right now. But I would support the view that since
docker exec
is the official way, to go with that. The author ofnsenter
actually recommends usingdocker exec
. If you encounter any drawbacks, he encourages you to report them though.docker exec versus nsenter
There are differences between nsenter and docker exec; namely, nsenter doesn't enter the cgroups, and therefore evades resource limitations. The potential benefit of this would be debugging and external audit, but for remote access, docker exec is the current recommended approach.
Only works on Intel 64 bits platforms. Arguably, this is the only officially supported platform for Docker; so it's not a big deal.
nsenter still needs to run from the host; it cannot run inside a container (yet).
ref: https://github.com/jpetazzo/nsenter/blob/master/README.md