I have a generic
List<MyClass>
where MyClass
has a property InvoiceNumber
which contains values such as:
200906/1
200906/2
..
200906/10
200906/11
200906/12
My list is bound to a
BindingList<T>
which supports sorting with linq:
protected override void ApplySortCore(
PropertyDescriptor property, ListSortDirection direction)
{
_sortProperty = property;
_sortDirection = direction;
var items = this.Items;
switch (direction)
{
case ListSortDirection.Ascending:
items = items.OrderByDescending(x => property.GetValue(x)).ToList();
break;
case ListSortDirection.Descending:
items = items.OrderByDescending(x => property.GetValue(x)).ToList();
break;
}
this.Items = items;
}
However the default comparer sorts (as supposed) like this:
200906/1
200906/10
200906/11
200906/12
200906/2
which is nasty in this case.
Now I want to use my own IComparer<T>
with this. It looks like this:
public class MyComparer : IComparer<Object>
{
public int Compare(Object stringA, Object stringB)
{
String[] valueA = stringA.ToString().Split('/');
String[] valueB = stringB.ToString().Split('/');
if(valueA .Length != 2 || valueB .Length != 2)
return String.Compare(stringA.ToString(), stringB.ToString());
if (valueA[0] == valueB[0])
{
return String.Compare(valueA[1], valueB[1]);
}
else
{
return String.Compare(valueA[0], valueB[0]);
}
}
}
and changed the ApplySortCore
code to use this IComparer
:
case ListSortDirection.Ascending:
MyComparer comparer = new MyComparer();
items = items.OrderByDescending(
x => property.GetValue(x), comparer).ToList();
break;
When I debug my code, I see that MyComparer.Compare(object, object)
is called multiple times and returns the right values (-1, 0, 1) for a compare method.
But my list is still sorted the "wrong" way. Am I missing something? I have no clue.
You can use The Alphanum Algorithm:
AlphanumComparator
Your comparer looks wrong to me. You're still just sorting in the default text ordering. Surely you want to be parsing the two numbers and sorting based on that:
(Note that this doesn't sit well with your question stating that you've debugged through and verified that Compare is returning the right value - but I'm afraid I suspect human error on that front.)
Additionally, Sven's right - changing the value of
items
doesn't change your bound list at all. You should add:at the bottom of your method.
I encountered the issue of general natural sorting and blogged the solution here:
Natural Sort Compare with Linq OrderBy()
The sorted list is only bound to the local variable items, not to the Items property of your binding list, hence it remains unsorted.
[Edit] Basically, you're simply throwing away the result of your sorting efforts ;-)
Can't we do like this:
Usage:
This is same as :