The following code gives me a very nice violinplot (and boxplot within).
import numpy as np
import seaborn as sns
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
foo = np.random.rand(100)
sns.violinplot(foo)
plt.boxplot(foo)
plt.show()
So far so good. However, when I look at foo
, the variable does not contain any negative values. The seaborn
plot seems misleading here. The normal matplotlib boxplot gives something closer to what I would expect.
How can I make violinplots with a better fit (not showing false negative values)?
As the comments note, this is a consequence (I'm not sure I'd call it an "artifact") of the assumptions underlying gaussian KDE. As has been mentioned, this is somewhat unavoidable, and if your data don't meet those assumptions, you might be better off just using a boxplot, which shows only points that exist in the actual data.
However, in your response you ask about whether it could be fit "tighter", which could mean a few things.
One answer might be to change the bandwidth of the smoothing kernel. You do that with the
bw
argument, which is actually a scale factor; the bandwidth that will be used isbw * data.std()
:Another answer might be to truncate the violin at the extremes of the datapoints. The KDE will still be fit with densities that extend past the bounds of your data, but the tails will not be shown. You do that with the
cut
parameter, which specifies how many units of bandwidth past the extreme values the density should be drawn. To truncate, set it to 0:By the way, the API for
violinplot
is going to change in 0.6, and I'm using the development version here, but both thebw
andcut
arguments exist in the current released version and behave more or less the same way.