Java logical operator short-circuiting

2018-12-31 03:04发布

Which set is short-circuiting, and what exactly does it mean that the complex conditional expression is short-circuiting?

public static void main(String[] args) {
  int x, y, z;

  x = 10;
  y = 20;
  z = 30;

  // T T
  // T F
  // F T
  // F F

  //SET A
  boolean a = (x < z) && (x == x);
  boolean b = (x < z) && (x == z);
  boolean c = (x == z) && (x < z);
  boolean d = (x == z) && (x > z);
  //SET B    
  boolean aa = (x < z) & (x == x);
  boolean bb = (x < z) & (x == z);
  boolean cc = (x == z) & (x < z);
  boolean dd = (x == z) & (x > z);

}

9条回答
心情的温度
2楼-- · 2018-12-31 03:20
boolean a = (x < z) && (x == x);

This kind will short-circuit, meaning if (x < z) evaluates to false then the latter is not evaluated, a will be false, otherwise && will also evaluate (x == x).

& is a bitwise operator, but also a boolean AND operator which does not short-circuit.

You can test them by something as follows (see how many times the method is called in each case):

public static boolean getFalse() {
    System.out.println("Method");
    return false;
}

public static void main(String[] args) {
    if(getFalse() && getFalse()) { }        
    System.out.println("=============================");        
    if(getFalse() & getFalse()) { }
}
查看更多
临风纵饮
3楼-- · 2018-12-31 03:26

Short circuiting means the second operator will not be checked if the first operator decides the final outcome.

E.g. Expression is: True || False

In case of ||, all we need is one of the side to be True. So if the left hand side is true, there is no point in checking the right hand side, and hence that will not be checked at all.

Similarly, False && True

In case of &&, we need both sides to be True. So if the left hand side is False, there is no point in checking the right hand side, the answer has to be False. And hence that will not be checked at all.

查看更多
长期被迫恋爱
4楼-- · 2018-12-31 03:27

Logical OR :- returns true if at least one of the operands evaluate to true. Both operands are evaluated before apply the OR operator.

Short Circuit OR :- if left hand side operand returns true, it returns true without evaluating the right hand side operand.

查看更多
十年一品温如言
5楼-- · 2018-12-31 03:27

There are a couple of differences between the & and && operators. The same differences apply to | and ||. The most important thing to keep in mind is that && is a logical operator that only applies to boolean operands, while & is a bitwise operator that applies to integer types as well as booleans.

With a logical operation, you can do short circuiting because in certain cases (like the first operand of && being false, or the first operand of || being true), you do not need to evaluate the rest of the expression. This is very useful for doing things like checking for null before accessing a filed or method, and checking for potential zeros before dividing by them. For a complex expression, each part of the expression is evaluated recursively in the same manner. For example, in the following case:

(7 == 8) || ((1 == 3) && (4 == 4))

Only the emphasized portions will evaluated. To compute the ||, first check if 7 == 8 is true. If it were, the right hand side would be skipped entirely. The right hand side only checks if 1 == 3 is false. Since it is, 4 == 4 does not need to be checked, and the whole expression evaluates to false. If the left hand side were true, e.g. 7 == 7 instead of 7 == 8, the entire right hand side would be skipped because the whole || expression would be true regardless.

With a bitwise operation, you need to evaluate all the operands because you are really just combining the bits. Booleans are effectively a one-bit integer in Java (regardless of how the internals work out), and it is just a coincidence that you can do short circuiting for bitwise operators in that one special case. The reason that you can not short-circuit a general integer & or | operation is that some bits may be on and some may be off in either operand. Something like 1 & 2 yields zero, but you have no way of knowing that without evaluating both operands.

查看更多
后来的你喜欢了谁
6楼-- · 2018-12-31 03:34
if(demon!=0&& num/demon>10)

Since the short-circuit form of AND(&&) is used, there is no risk of causing a run-time exception when demon is zero.

Ref. Java 2 Fifth Edition by Herbert Schildt

查看更多
余生无你
7楼-- · 2018-12-31 03:42

Java provides two interesting Boolean operators not found in most other computer languages. These secondary versions of AND and OR are known as short-circuit logical operators. As you can see from the preceding table, the OR operator results in true when A is true, no matter what B is.

Similarly, the AND operator results in false when A is false, no matter what B is. If you use the || and && forms, rather than the | and & forms of these operators, Java will not bother to evaluate the right-hand operand alone. This is very useful when the right-hand operand depends on the left one being true or false in order to function properly.

For example, the following code fragment shows how you can take advantage of short-circuit logical evaluation to be sure that a division operation will be valid before evaluating it:

if ( denom != 0 && num / denom >10)

Since the short-circuit form of AND (&&) is used, there is no risk of causing a run-time exception from dividing by zero. If this line of code were written using the single & version of AND, both sides would have to be evaluated, causing a run-time exception when denom is zero.

It is standard practice to use the short-circuit forms of AND and OR in cases involving Boolean logic, leaving the single-character versions exclusively for bitwise operations. However, there are exceptions to this rule. For example, consider the following statement:

 if ( c==1 & e++ < 100 ) d = 100;

Here, using a single & ensures that the increment operation will be applied to e whether c is equal to 1 or not.

查看更多
登录 后发表回答