Why can't I use a compatible concrete type whe

2019-01-23 15:57发布

I would like to be able to do something like this :

using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Linq;
using System.Text;

namespace Test
{
    public interface IFoo
    {
        IEnumerable<int> integers { get; set; }
    }

    public class Bar : IFoo
    {
        public List<int> integers { get; set; }
    }
}

Why does the compiler complains..?

Error   2   'Test.Bar' does not implement interface member 'Test.IFoo.integers'. 'Test.Bar.integers' cannot implement 'Test.IFoo.integers' because it does not have the matching return type of 'System.Collections.Generic.IEnumerable<int>'.

I understand that the interface says IEnumerable and the class uses a List, but a List is an IEnumerable.....

what can I do? I do not want to specify IEnumerable in the class, I want to use a concrete type that implements IEnumerable, like List...

3条回答
聊天终结者
2楼-- · 2019-01-23 16:10

Although List implements IEnumerable that's not the way interfaces work. The interface specifies exactly which types need to be exposed for properties. If you created a generic interface like

public interface IFoo<T> where T : IEnumerable<int>
{
    T integers { get; set; }
}

You could then use IFoo<List<int>> to implement it in the way you expect.

查看更多
▲ chillily
3楼-- · 2019-01-23 16:10

You're not going to be able to use a concrete type unless you do it behind the scenes. The problem is that you can both Get and Set the Property.

Your interface specifies that the property is of type IEnumerable<int>. HashSet<int> implements IEnumerable<int>. That means the following should work just fine:

IFoo instance = new Bar();
instance.integers = new HashSet<int>();

But since you're trying to implement the interface using the concrete type List<int>, there's no way that assignment can work.

The easiest fix, assuming you don't constantly need to re-assign the collection, would be to only specify a getter for the collection:

public interface IFoo
{
    IEnumerable<int> Integers { get; }
}

public class Bar
{
    public List<int> Integers { get; private set; }

    public Bar(List<int> list)
    {
        Integers = list;
    }
}
查看更多
爱情/是我丢掉的垃圾
4楼-- · 2019-01-23 16:12

This is a Type Covariance/Contravariance issue (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Covariance_and_contravariance_(computer_science)#C.23 ).

There's a workaround: use explicit interfaces, like so:

public class Bar : IFoo {

    private IList<int> _integers;

    IEnumerable<int> IFoo.integers {
        get { return _integers };
        set { _integers = value as IList<int>; }
    }

    public IList<int> integers {
        get { return _integers; }
        set { _integers = vale; }
    }
}

Note that integers should be TitleCased to conform to .NET's guidelines.

Hopefully you can see the problem in the code above: IList<int> is compatible with IEnumerable<int> only for the accessor, but not for setting. What happens if someone calls IFoo.integers = new Qux<int>() (where Qux : IEnumerable<int> but not Qux : IList<int>).

查看更多
登录 后发表回答