I have two lines: Line1 and Line2. Each line is defined by two points (P1L1(x1, y1), P2L1(x2, y2)
and P1L1(x1, y1), P2L3(x2, y3))
. I want to know the inner angle defined by these two lines.
For do it I calculate the angle of each line with the abscissa:
double theta1 = atan(m1) * (180.0 / PI);
double theta2 = atan(m2) * (180.0 / PI);
After to know the angle I calculate the following:
double angle = abs(theta2 - theta1);
The problem or doubt that I have is: sometimes I get the correct angle but sometimes I get the complementary angle (for me outer). How can I know when subtract 180º
to know the inner angle? There is any algorithm better to do that? Because I tried some methods: dot product,
following formula:
result = (m1 - m2) / (1.0 + (m1 * m2));
But always I have the same problem; I never known when I have the outer angle or the inner angle!
I hope I understand your question correctly as wanting the acute angle rather than the obtuse angle of the intersection of two lines. Am I correct?
Acute and obtuse angles of an intersection are 180 deg complements of each other. i.e.
http://www.mathworks.com/access/helpdesk/help/techdoc/ref/atan.html exhibits that an atan is asymptotic at +/- pi/2.
Therefore, the max difference between two results of atan is pi or 180 deg, whether you use the
+/-
notation or positive0 to pi
notation of a gradient.Consider the following pseudocode:
The function
acuteAngle
illustrates what you need to do, mathematically.However, it cannot be used for values of angles in the neighbourhood of PI/2 because binary comparisons of angles with results in that neighbourhood is questionable whether an obtuse or acute angle is represented.
Therefore, we have to compare the coordinates of the points of the two lines. We find out whether the 3rd line formed from
[(x2,y2)(x3,y3)]
is shorter, equal or longer than the hypothetical hypotenuse.By virtue of Pythagoras' theorem, A hypotenuse is formed if the angle is exactly PI/2 or 90 deg. Let's call his hypothetical hypotenuse line L3Hypo.
By geometrical visualisation in your mind,
Therefore,
Therefore, the following pseudo-code,
Presuming you already have the function getGradient(Point P, Q):
I may have committed some typo mistakes in the pseudo-code (hopefully not) but I demonstrated the gist of the concept. If so, someone could be so kind to edit away the typos.
Further However, after mulling over it, I find that the struggle for precision pivots on its weakest link due to the directive
So, we might as well save all the trouble and simply do this:
If you want in between angle in 0 degree to 360 degree then use following code; Its fully tested and functional:
}
Note: Rotation will be clockwise;
Inner angle between 2 vectors (v1, v2) = arc cos ( inner product(v1,v2) / (module(v1) * module(v2)) ).
Where inner product(v1,v2) = xv1*xv2 + yv1*yv2
module(v) = sqrt(pow(xv,2) + pow(yv,2))
So, the answer of your question is implemented on the following example:
If you use abolute value you will always get the acute angle. That is tangent theta = abs value of m1-m2 over (1 +m1 * m2). If you take inverse tangent your answer will be in radians or degrees however the calculator is set. Sorry this isnt programming lingo, I am a math teacher, not a programmer...
Getting the outer angle vs the inner angle is determined entirely by the order of your subtractions (think about it). You need to subtract the smaller theta from the larger in order to reliably always get the inner angle. You also probably want to use the
atan2
function because of the type of data you're expecting.That way it will always be the inner angle. Just add it after you get result.