What is a good strategy for keeping IPython notebooks under version control?
The notebook format is quite amenable for version control: if one wants to version control the notebook and the outputs then this works quite well. The annoyance comes when one wants only to version control the input, excluding the cell outputs (aka. "build products") which can be large binary blobs, especially for movies and plots. In particular, I am trying to find a good workflow that:
- allows me to choose between including or excluding output,
- prevents me from accidentally committing output if I do not want it,
- allows me to keep output in my local version,
- allows me to see when I have changes in the inputs using my version control system (i.e. if I only version control the inputs but my local file has outputs, then I would like to be able to see if the inputs have changed (requiring a commit). Using the version control status command will always register a difference since the local file has outputs.)
- allows me to update my working notebook (which contains the output) from an updated clean notebook. (update)
As mentioned, if I chose to include the outputs (which is desirable when using nbviewer for example), then everything is fine. The problem is when I do not want to version control the output. There are some tools and scripts for stripping the output of the notebook, but frequently I encounter the following issues:
- I accidentally commit a version with the the output, thereby polluting my repository.
- I clear output to use version control, but would really rather keep the output in my local copy (sometimes it takes a while to reproduce for example).
- Some of the scripts that strip output change the format slightly compared to the
Cell/All Output/Clear
menu option, thereby creating unwanted noise in the diffs. This is resolved by some of the answers. - When pulling changes to a clean version of the file, I need to find some way of incorporating those changes in my working notebook without having to rerun everything. (update)
I have considered several options that I shall discuss below, but have yet to find a good comprehensive solution. A full solution might require some changes to IPython, or may rely on some simple external scripts. I currently use mercurial, but would like a solution that also works with git: an ideal solution would be version-control agnostic.
This issue has been discussed many times, but there is no definitive or clear solution from the user's perspective. The answer to this question should provide the definitive strategy. It is fine if it requires a recent (even development) version of IPython or an easily installed extension.
Update: I have been playing with my modified notebook version which optionally saves a .clean
version with every save using Gregory Crosswhite's suggestions. This satisfies most of my constraints but leaves the following unresolved:
- This is not yet a standard solution (requires a modification of the ipython source. Is there a way of achieving this behaviour with a simple extension? Needs some sort of on-save hook.
- A problem I have with the current workflow is pulling changes. These will come in to the
.clean
file, and then need to be integrated somehow into my working version. (Of course, I can always re-execute the notebook, but this can be a pain, especially if some of the results depend on long calculations, parallel computations, etc.) I do not have a good idea about how to resolve this yet. Perhaps a workflow involving an extension like ipycache might work, but that seems a little too complicated.
Notes
Removing (stripping) Output
- When the notebook is running, one can use the
Cell/All Output/Clear
menu option for removing the output. - There are some scripts for removing output, such as the script nbstripout.py which remove the output, but does not produce the same output as using the notebook interface. This was eventually included in the ipython/nbconvert repo, but this has been closed stating that the changes are now included in ipython/ipython,but the corresponding functionality seems not to have been included yet. (update) That being said, Gregory Crosswhite's solution shows that this is pretty easy to do, even without invoking ipython/nbconvert, so this approach is probably workable if it can be properly hooked in. (Attaching it to each version control system, however, does not seem like a good idea — this should somehow hook in to the notebook mechanism.)
Newsgroups
Issues
- 977: Notebook feature requests (Open).
- 1280: Clear-all on save option (Open). (Follows from this discussion.)
- 3295: autoexported notebooks: only export explicitly marked cells (Closed). Resolved by extension 11 Add writeandexecute magic (Merged).
Pull Requests
- 1621: clear In[] prompt numbers on "Clear All Output" (Merged). (See also 2519 (Merged).)
- 1563: clear_output improvements (Merged).
- 3065: diff-ability of notebooks (Closed).
- 3291: Add the option to skip output cells when saving. (Closed). This seems extremely relevant, however was closed with the suggestion to use a "clean/smudge" filter. A relevant question what can you use if you want to strip off output before running git diff? seems not to have been answered.
- 3312: WIP: Notebook save hooks (Closed).
- 3747: ipynb -> ipynb transformer (Closed). This is rebased in 4175.
- 4175: nbconvert: Jinjaless exporter base (Merged).
- 142: Use STDIN in nbstripout if no input is given (Open).
(2017-02)
strategies
nbstripout
, )nbstripout
,)nbconvert
to python: name.ipynb.py (nbconvert
)nbconvert
,ipymd
)tools
nbstripout
: strip the outputs from a notebookpip install nbstripout; nbstripout install
ipynb_output_filter
: strip the outputs from a notebookipymd
: convert between {Jupyter, Markdown, O'Reilly Atlas Markdown, OpenDocument, .py}nbdime
: "Tools for diffing and merging of Jupyter notebooks." (2015)nbdiff
: compare notebooks in a terminal-friendly waynbmerge
: three-way merge of notebooks with automatic conflict resolutionnbdiff-web
: shows you a rich rendered diff of notebooksnbmerge-web
: gives you a web-based three-way merge tool for notebooksnbshow
: present a single notebook in a terminal-friendly wayTo follow up on the excellent script by Pietro Battiston, if you get a Unicode parsing error like this:
You can add at the beginning of the script:
After digging around, I finally found this relatively simple pre-save hook on the Jupyter docs. It strips the cell output data. You have to paste it into the
jupyter_notebook_config.py
file (see below for instructions).From Rich Signell's answer:
I did what Albert & Rich did - Don't version .ipynb files (as these can contain images, which gets messy). Instead, either always run
ipython notebook --script
or putc.FileNotebookManager.save_script = True
in your config file, so that a (versionable).py
file is always created when you save your notebook.To regenerate notebooks (after checking out a repo or switching a branch) I put the script py_file_to_notebooks.py in the directory where I store my notebooks.
Now, after checking out a repo, just run
python py_file_to_notebooks.py
to generate the ipynb files. After switching branch, you may have to runpython py_file_to_notebooks.py -ov
to overwrite the existing ipynb files.Just to be on the safe side, it's good to also add
*.ipynb
to your.gitignore
file.Edit: I no longer do this because (A) you have to regenerate your notebooks from py files every time you checkout a branch and (B) there's other stuff like markdown in notebooks that you lose. I instead strip output from notebooks using a git filter. Discussion on how to do this is here.
I've built python package that solves this problem
https://github.com/brookisme/gitnb
It provides a CLI with a git-inspired syntax to track/update/diff notebooks inside your git repo.
Heres' an example
Note that last step, where I'm using "gitnb commit" is committing to your git repo. Its essentially a wrapper for
There are several more methods, and can be configured so that it requires more or less user input at each stage, but thats the general idea.
I use a very pragmatic approach; which work well for several notebooks, at several sides. And it even enables me to 'transfer' notebooks around. It works both for Windows as Unix/MacOS.
Al thought it is simple, is solve the problems above...
Concept
Basically, do not track the
.ipnyb
-files, only the corresponding.py
-files.By starting the notebook-server with the
--script
option, that file is automatically created/saved when the notebook is saved.Those
.py
-files do contain all input; non-code is saved into comments, as are the cell-borders. Those file can be read/imported ( and dragged) into the notebook-server to (re)create a notebook. Only the output is gone; until it is re-run.Personally I use mercurial to version-track the
.py
files; and use the normal (command-line) commands to add, check-in (ect) for that. Most other (D)VCS will allow this to.Its simple to track the history now; the
.py
are small, textual and simple to diff. Once and a while, we need a clone (just branch; start a 2nd notebook-sever there), or a older version (check-it out and import into a notebook-server), etc.Tips & tricks
--script
option) and do version-track it.py
-file, but does not check it in.Wishes
file@date+rev.py
) should be helpful It would be to much work to add that; and maybe I will do so once. Until now, I just do that by hand.