I've some experience Spring now and also have some pure java config web-apps in use. However, these are usually based on a quiet simple setup:
- application config for services / repositories
- dispatcher config for one dispatcher (and some controllers)
- (optional) spring security to secure the access
For my current project I need to have separate dispatcher contexts with different configuration. That's not a problem with the XML based configuration as we have a dedicated ContextLoaderListener that's independent from Dispatcher Configuration. But with java config I'm not sure if what I'm doing is fine so far ;)
Here's a common DispatcherConfig:
public class MyWebAppInitializer extends AbstractAnnotationConfigDispatcherServletInitializer {
@Override
protected Class<?>[] getRootConfigClasses() {
return new class[]{MyAppConfig.class};
}
@Override
protected Class<?>[] getServletConfigClasses() {
return new Class[]{MyDispatcherConfig.class};
}
@Override
protected String[] getServletMappings() {
return new String[]{"/mymapping/*"};
}
@Override
protected String getServletName() {
return "myservlet";
}
}
As said, I need a second (third, ...) dispatcher with another mapping (and view resolvers). So, I copied the config and added for both getServletName() (otherwise both will be named as 'dispatcher' which will cause errors). The second config was looking like that:
public class AnotherWebAppInitializer extends AbstractAnnotationConfigDispatcherServletInitializer {
@Override
protected Class<?>[] getRootConfigClasses() {
return new class[]{MyAppConfig.class};
}
@Override
protected Class<?>[] getServletConfigClasses() {
return new Class[]{AnotherDispatcherConfig.class};
}
@Override
protected String[] getServletMappings() {
return new String[]{"/another_mapping/*"};
}
@Override
protected String getServletName() {
return "anotherservlet";
}
}
When I use it like this, starting application results in a problem with ContextLoaderListener:
java.lang.IllegalStateException: Cannot initialize context because there is already a root application context present - check whether you have multiple ContextLoader* definitions in your web.xml!
at org.springframework.web.context.ContextLoader.initWebApplicationContext(ContextLoader.java:277)
...
So I removed the second MyAppConfig.class return from one of the AbstractAnnotationConfigDispatcherServletInitializer and it works fine. However, that doesn't feel to be the right way ;)
For my understanding: should all DispatcherConfig be handled within one AbstractAnnotationConfigDispatcherServletInitializer or should I separate them as I did? I tried to configure them in one class but then my config was totally mixed (so I believe that's not the desired way).
How do you implement such a case? Is it possible to set the ContextLoaderListener in java config outside of the AbstractAnnotationConfigDispatcherServletInitializer? Or should I create a DefaultServlet which has only the root config? What about implementing the base interface of that configuration WebApplicationInitializer?
I think you can work it out if you use generic WebApplicationInitializer interface rather than using abstract implementation provided by spring - AbstractAnnotationConfigDispatcherServletInitializer.
That way, you could create two separate initializers, so you would get different ServletContext on startUp() method and register different AppConfig & dispatcher servlets for each of them.
One of such implementing class may look like this:
I faced the same issue. Actually I had a complex configuration with multiple dispatcher servlets, filters and listeners.
I had a web.xml like below
I replaced above web.xml with below java file
Mahesh C. showed the right path, but his implementation is too limited. He is right on one point : you cannot use directly
AbstractAnnotationConfigDispatcherServletInitializer
for multiple dispatcher servlet. But the implementation should :Here is a more complete implementation :
That way, you have full control on which beans will end in which context, exactly as you would have with XML configuration.