I am using the following methods:
public void M1(Int32 a)
{
// acquire MyMutex
DoSomething(a);
// release MyMutex
}
and
public void M2(String s, String t)
{
// acquire MyMutex
DoSomethingElse(s, t);
// release MyMutex
}
From what I have found so far it seems that it is not possible to use a single delegate for two methods with different signatures.
Are there any other alternatives to write something like this:
public void UsingMutex(...)
{
// acquire MyMutex
...
// release MyMutex
}
UsingMutex(M1);
UsingMutex(M2);
All I can think for the moment is to use two delegates and a boolean flag to know which delegate to call, but it is not a long term solution.
It is possible to combine generics with delegates? And if so, do you have some links for any kind of documentation?
Environment: C# 2.0
If you look at the
Func<T>
andAction<T>
delegates in the framework, you'll see that they define a number of similar delegates with different number of parameters. You can use generics, but that doesn't solve the number of arguments issue you're talking about.Absolutely you can mix delegates with generics. In 2.0,
Predicate<T>
etc are good examples of this, but you must have the same number of args. In this scenario, perhaps an option is to use captures to include the args in the delegate?i.e.
Note that
Action
is defined for you in .NET 3.5, but you can re-declare it for 2.0 purposes ;-pNote that the anonymous method (
delegate {...}
) can also be parameterised:Finally, C# 3.0 makes this all a lot easier and prettier with "lambdas", but that is another topic ;-p
Yes, it's possible to combine generics with delegates.
But you still have to handle different number of parameters using overloads.