I just found out how to check if operator<<
is provided for a type.
template<class T> T& lvalue_of_type();
template<class T> T rvalue_of_type();
template<class T>
struct is_printable
{
template<class U> static char test(char(*)[sizeof(
lvalue_of_type<std::ostream>() << rvalue_of_type<U>()
)]);
template<class U> static long test(...);
enum { value = 1 == sizeof test<T>(0) };
typedef boost::integral_constant<bool, value> type;
};
Is this trick well-known, or have I just won the metaprogramming Nobel prize? ;)
EDIT: I made the code simpler to understand and easier to adapt with two global function template declarations lvalue_of_type
and rvalue_of_type
.
It's a well known technique, I'm afraid :-)
The use of a function call in the
sizeof
operator instructs the compiler to perform argument deduction and function matching, at compile-time, of course. Also, with a template function, the compiler also instantiates a concrete function from a template. However, this expression does does not cause a function call to be generated. It's well described in SFINAE Sono Buoni PDF.Check other C++ SFINAE examples.
It is just a combination of two well-known tricks. SFINAE says 'substitution failure is not an error' - that's exactly what you did. Using
sizeof
to let the compiler substitute template arguments into an expression without actually executing it is also common.Sorry :-)