I am using a Generic Class as a Response Data Contract. All is good and this is streamlining the design of my WCF service significantly.
Each request is given a standard response object with the following signature:
- Status (Enum)
- Message (String)
- Result (T)
Below is the Response Class:
[DataContract]
public class Response<T>
{
public Response() {}
public Response(T result)
{
this.result = result;
if (result != null)
{
this.status = Status.StatusEnum.Success;
}
else
{
this.status = Status.StatusEnum.Warning;
}
}
public Response(T result, Status.StatusEnum status)
{
this.status = status;
this.message = message;
}
public Response(T result, Status.StatusEnum status, string message)
{
this.status = status;
this.message = message;
this.result = result;
}
[DataMember]
public Status.StatusEnum status { get; set; }
[DataMember]
public string message { get; set; }
[DataMember]
public T result { get; set; }
}
And this works brillantly. Only problem I have is that the WCF Client is given a really crappy name for this object "ResponseOfAccountnT9LOUZL"
Is there a way to get around this issue?
Should I be using this class as just a Abstract class which is inherited? I'd rather not have multiple classes cluttering my code.
Thank you Harry
Ok found the Answer
You can specify the Serialised version using the following syntax:
So if I had a Class called Response which takes a Generic T parameter I would use