Components using Date objects produce different sn

Question

I'm using Enzyme with enzyme-to-json to do Jest snapshot testing of my React components. I'm testing shallow snapshots of a DateRange component that renders a display field with the current range (e.g. 5/20/2016 - 7/18/2016) and two DateInput components that allow selecting a Date value. This means that my snapshot contains the Dates I pass to the component both in the DateInput props and in a text representation it resolves itself. In my test I'm creating some fixed dates using both new Date(1995, 4, 23).

When I run my test in different timezones, this produces different snapshots, because the Date(year, month, ...) constructor creates the date in the local timezone. E.g. use of new Date() produces this difference in snapshot between runs in my local timezone and on our CI server.

- value={1995-05-22T22:00:00.000Z}
+ value={1995-05-23T00:00:00.000Z}

I tried removing the timezone offset from the dates, but then the snapshot differed in the display field value, where the local timezone-dependent representation is used.

- value={5/20/2016 - 7/18/2016}
+ value={5/19/2016 - 7/17/2016}

How can I make my tests produce the same Dates in snapshots regardless of the timezone they're run in?

Answer 1

I struggled with this for hours/days and only this worked for me:

1) In your test:

Date.now = jest.fn(() => new Date(Date.UTC(2017, 7, 9, 8)).valueOf())

2) Then change the TZ env var before running your tests. So the script in my package.json:

• (Mac & Linux only)

  "test": "TZ=America/New_York react-scripts test --env=jsdom",
  

• (Windows)

  "test": "set TZ=America/New_York && react-scripts test --env=jsdom",
  

Answer 2

I ended up with a solution comprised of two parts.

1. Never create Date objects in tests in timezone-dependent manner. If you don't want to use timestamps directly to have readable test code, use Date.UTC, e.g.

   new Date(Date.UTC(1995, 4, 23))
   

2. Mock the date formatter used to turn Dates into display values, so that it returns a timezone-independent representation, e.g. use Date::toISOString(). Fortunately this was easy in my case, as I just needed to mock the formatDate function in my localization module. It might be harder if the component is somehow turning Dates into strings on its own.

---

Before I arrived at the above solution, I tried to somehow change how the snapshots are created. It was ugly, because enzyme-to-json saves a local copy of toISOString(), so I had to use _.cloneDeepWith and modify all the Dates. It didn't work out for me anyway, because my tests also contained cases of Date creation from timestamps (the component is quite a bit more complicated than I described above) and interactions between those and the dates I was creating in the tests explicitly. So I first had to make sure all my date definitions were referring to the same timezone and the rest followed.

---

Update (11/3/2017): When I checked enzyme-to-json recently, I haven't been able to find the local saving of toISOString(), so maybe that's no longer an issue and it could be mocked. I haven't been able to find it in history either though, so maybe I just incorrectly noted which library did it. Test at your own peril :)

Answer 3

I ended up getting around this by mocking the toLocaleString (or whatever toString method you are using) prototype. Using sinon I did:

var toLocaleString;

beforeAll(() => {
    toLocaleString = sinon.stub(Date.prototype, 'toLocaleString', () => 'fake time')
})

afterAll(() => {
    toLocaleString.restore()
})

This way if you are generating strings straight from a Date object, you're still OK.