Is it a bad idea to use printStackTrace() in Android Exceptions like this?
} catch (Exception e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
Is it a bad idea to use printStackTrace() in Android Exceptions like this?
} catch (Exception e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
Yes, it is a bad idea. You should instead use Android's built-in log class specifically designed for these purposes: http://developer.android.com/reference/android/util/Log.html
It gives you options to log debug messages, warnings, errors etc.
Logging errors with:
Log.e(TAG, "message", e)
where the message can be an explanation of what was being attempted when the exception was thrownor simply
Log.e(TAG, e)
if you do not wish to provide any message for contextYou can then click on the log console at the bottom while running your code and easily search it using the TAG or log message type as a filter
The question is: is useful at all print to the stack trace in an Andriod application context? Will the standard output be visible at runtime? Will somebody care about it?
My point is that, if nobody is going to check the standard output and care to debug the error, the call to this method is dead code, and composing the stacktrace message is a worthless expense. If you need it only for debugging at development, you could set an accesible global constant, and check it at runtime:
I believe this is what you need:
I would avoid using
printStackTrace()
, use a logging system and its support of exceptions.So if you want to change how logging is handled it's much easier.
Yes.
printStackTrace()
is convenient but discouraged, especially on Android where it is visible throughlogcat
but gets logged at an unspecified level and without a proper message. Instead, the proper way to log an exception is...Note that the exception is used as a third parameter, not appended to the message parameter.
Log
handles the details for you – printing your message (which gives the context of what you were trying to do in your code) and theException
's message, as well as its stack trace.