We have a large application mainly written in SQL Server 7.0, where all database calls are to stored procedures. We are now running SQL Server 2005, which offers more T-SQL features.
After just about every SELECT, INSERT, UPDATE, and DELETE, the @@ROWCOUNT and @@ERROR get captured into local variables and evaluated for problems. If there is a problem the following is done:
- error message output parameter is set
- rollback (if necessary) is done
- info is written (INSERT) to log table
- return with a error number, unique to this procedure (positive if fatal, negative is warning)
They all don't check the rows (only when it is known) and some differ with more or less log/debug info. Also, the rows logic is somethimes split from the error logic (on updates where a concurrency field is checked in the WHERE clause, rows=0 means someone else has updated the data). However, here is a fairly generic example:
SELECT, INSERT, UPDATE, or DELETE
SELECT @Error=@@ERROR, @Rows=@@ROWCOUNT
IF @Rows!=1 OR @Error!=0
BEGIN
SET @ErrorMsg='ERROR 20, ' + ISNULL(OBJECT_NAME(@@PROCID), 'unknown')
+ ' - unable to ???????? the ????.'
IF @@TRANCOUNT >0
BEGIN
ROLLBACK
END
SET @LogInfo=ISNULL(@LogInfo,'')+'; '+ISNULL(@ErrorMsg,'')+
+ ' @YYYYY=' +dbo.FormatString(@YYYYY)
+', @XXXXX=' +dbo.FormatString(@XXXXX)
+', Error=' +dbo.FormatString(@Error)
+', Rows=' +dbo.FormatString(@Rows)
INSERT INTO MyLogTable (...,Message) VALUES (....,@LogInfo)
RETURN 20
END
I am looking into replacing how we do this with the TRY-CATCH T-SQL. I've read about the TRY...CATCH (Transact-SQL) syntax, so don't just post some summary of that. I'm looking for any good ideas and how best to do or improve our error handling methods. It doesn't have to be Try-Catch, just any good or best practice use of T-SQL error handling.
There isn't a set in stone best practices for Error handling. It all comes down to what your needs are and being consistent.
Here is a sample of a table and stored procedure that stores phone numbers.
We currently use this template for any queries that we execute (you could leave out the Transaction stuff, if you don't need it in e.g. a DDL statement):
Of course, you could easily insert the caught exception into your error log table.
It works really well for us. You could probably even automate some of the conversion from your old stored procs to a new format using Code Generation (e.g. CodeSmith) or some custom C# code.
You should read this:
http://www.sommarskog.se/error-handling-I.html
I can't recommend that link highly enough. It's a bit long, but in a good way.
There's a disclaimer at the front that it was originally written for SQL Server 2000, but it covers the new try/catch error handling abilities in SQL Server 2005+ as well.
It looks like you have a very good handle on this already. I suspect you're doing more than 95% of the SQL programmers out there.
You should find some interesting information here:
One [unrelated] suggestion: start using '<>' instead of '!='.
[* SQL Junkies has gone away, so the second article is not available. I will try to get it republished somewhere and update the link.]