I would like to compute the cross product of two vectors in Fortran 90. For example, in words, the cross product of (1, 2, 3) and (4, 5, 6) turns out to be (-3, 6, -3) in Cartesian coordinates. I wrote the following code (main program followed by function definition):
PROGRAM crosstest
IMPLICIT NONE
INTEGER, DIMENSION(3) :: m, n
INTEGER, DIMENSION(3) :: cross
INTEGER, DIMENSION(3) :: r
m=(/1, 2, 3/)
n=(/4, 5, 6/)
r=cross(m,n)
END PROGRAM crosstest
FUNCTION cross(a, b)
INTEGER, DIMENSION(3) :: cross
INTEGER, DIMENSION(3), INTENT(IN) :: a, b
cross(1) = a(2) * b(3) - a(3) * b(2)
cross(2) = a(3) * b(1) - a(1) * b(3)
cross(3) = a(1) * b(2) - a(2) * b(1)
END FUNCTION cross
But, I get an error message:
crosstest.f90:10.9:
r=cross(m,n)
1
Error: Rank mismatch in array reference at (1) (2/1)
where line 10 is r=cross(m,n)
. It seems that I must be specifying a dimension incorrectly. Here are a few ideas I have:
Perhaps the declaration of the function
cross
in the main program should be simply an integer variable, rather than a 1by3 integer array. So I tried deleting the, DIMENSION(3)
in theINTEGER, DIMENSION(3) :: cross
line in the main program. But I get an error message:crosstest.f90:10.4: r=cross(m,n) 1 Error: The reference to function 'cross' at (1) either needs an explicit INTERFACE or the rank is incorrect
so this is even worse, probably.
Some (but not all) Fortran function examples on the web place an
EXTERNAL
statement after the function declaration in the main program. So I tried placing a lineEXTERNAL cross
after the declaration block in the main program. I get an error message:crosstest.f90:8.16: EXTERNAL cross 1 Error: EXTERNAL attribute conflicts with DIMENSION attribute at (1)
So this seems incorrect also.
Some (but not all) Fortran function examples on the web place a
RETURN
statement on the second-to-last line of the function definition. I tried this, but I get the original rank mismatch error:crosstest.f90:10.9: r=cross(m,n) 1 Error: Rank mismatch in array reference at (1) (2/1)
So this does not fix the problem.
Can you please help me see my error?
The best practice is to place your procedures (subroutines and functions) in a module and then "use" that module from your main program or other procedures. You don't need to "use" the module from other procedures of the same module. This will make the interface of the procedure explicit so that the calling program or procedure "knows" the characteristics of the arguments ... it allows the compiler to check for consistency between the arguments on both sides ... caller and callee .. this eliminates a lot of bugs.
Outside of the language standard, but in practice necessary: if you use one file, place the module before the main program that uses it. Otherwise the compiler will be unaware of it. so:
This is kind of a late answer, but since I stumbled upon this and there is no real explanation yet for why your error occurred, I figured I'd add an explanation for everybody else who stumbles upon this question:
In your program, you define an array called
cross
, which is of rank 1. Then you call thecross
function you define further down. Since thecross
function does not have an explicit interface (see M.S.B.'s answer), the compiler does not know about it at this point. What it does know about is the array you declared. If you writer = cross(m, n)
, the compiler thinks you want to access the element at position (m, n) of the arraycross
. Since this array is of rank 1, but you supplied two arguments, you get the errorwhich means that you supplied two coordinates when the compiler was expecting one.