Using schema.org markup, if I define many items with the same name across multiple pages, but with different sets of properties defined on each page, is each item only relevant within the scope of the page it is defined on, or is there a way to tie all of them items together to create a single, complete definition?
相关问题
- Is there an easy way to convert HTML with multiple
- How can I optimize a SPARQL query that returns opt
- Why should I not use deprecated align='right
- What is the best way to semantically structure a F
- Microdata/Schema.org/SEO: How to properly set a Co
相关文章
- The difference between blank nodes and variables i
- How to mark the copyright of an image in html?
- Schema.org for closed on a holiday / given date
- Meaning of owl:hasValue?
- boundary for arbitrary property path in SPARQL 1.1
- Multiple contexts in JSON-LD
- Microdata extraction from HTML in Java
- Right way to set microdata for Q&A HTML
Syntax:
itemid
Microdata defines an
itemid
attribute:The vocabulary (in this case, Schema.org) would have to define what exactly such a global identifier should mean, and if or if not multiple items may have the same global identifier, and if yes, how these items should be processed.
So far, Schema.org does not define this.
An obvious assumption would be: Items (whether on the same page or on different pages, whether on the same site or on different sites) with the same
itemid
are about the same thing.Vocabulary: unique property values
By specifying properties that expect unique values, consumers could (if they want to) deduce that two or more items are about the same thing.
The properties
sameAs
andurl
are appropriate candidates, as they can be used for any Schema.org type.Some more specific types define other suitable properties, like
globalLocationNumber
,email
etc.