I have the example demo program with a boost::interprocess Containers of containers type. But I like to use the class also a normal class within my process memory. Can someone help me to write a constructor which takes no arguments to have the class initialized in my current process memory.
#include <boost/interprocess/containers/vector.hpp>
#include <boost/interprocess/allocators/allocator.hpp>
#include <boost/interprocess/managed_shared_memory.hpp>
#include <boost/archive/xml_oarchive.hpp>
#include <boost/archive/xml_iarchive.hpp>
#include <shmfw/serialization/interprocess_vector.hpp>
#include <stdlib.h> /* srand, rand */
#include <time.h> /* time */
using namespace boost::interprocess;
//Alias an STL-like allocator of ints that allocates ints from the segment
typedef allocator<int, managed_shared_memory::segment_manager> ShmemAllocator;
//Alias a vector that uses the previous STL-like allocator
typedef vector<int, ShmemAllocator> MyVector;
typedef allocator<void, managed_shared_memory::segment_manager > void_allocator;
class MyStruct {
public:
MyVector myVector;
//Since void_allocator is convertible to any other allocator<T>, we can simplify
//the initialization taking just one allocator for all inner containers.
MyStruct ( const void_allocator &void_alloc )
: myVector ( void_alloc )
{}
// Thats what I like to have
//MyStruct ()
// : myVector ( ?? )
//{}
};
int main () {
// I would like to have something like that working and also the shm stuff below
// MyStruct x;
managed_shared_memory segment;
//A managed shared memory where we can construct objects
//associated with a c-string
try {
segment = managed_shared_memory( create_only, "MySharedMemory", 65536 );
} catch (...){
segment = managed_shared_memory( open_only, "MySharedMemory" );
}
//Initialize the STL-like allocator
const ShmemAllocator alloc_inst ( segment.get_segment_manager() );
MyStruct *myStruct_src = segment.find_or_construct<MyStruct> ( "MyStruct" ) ( alloc_inst );
srand (time(NULL));
myStruct_src->myVector.push_back ( rand() );
MyStruct *myStruct_des = segment.find_or_construct<MyStruct> ( "MyStruct" ) ( alloc_inst );
for ( size_t i = 0; i < myStruct_src->myVector.size(); i++ ) {
std::cout << i << ": " << myStruct_src->myVector[i] << " = " << myStruct_des->myVector[i] << std::endl;
if(myStruct_src->myVector[i] != myStruct_des->myVector[i]) {
std::cout << "Something went wrong!" << std::endl;
}
}
//segment.destroy<MyVector> ( "MyVector" );
return 0;
}
If you change the allocator type, you change the container (such is the nature of compile-time template instantiation).
Technically, you could devise a type-erased allocator (à la
std::function
orboost::any_iterator
) but this would probably result in abysmal performance. Also, it would still require all the allocators to correspond in all the statically known properties, reducing flexibility.In reality, I suggest just templatizing
MyStruct
on theAllocator
type to be used for any embedded containers. Then specifically take such an allocator in the constructor:Demo Program: