I have a simple struct that I would like to implement Index
for, but as a newcomer to Rust I'm having a number of troubles with the borrow checker. My struct is pretty simple, I'd like to have it store a start and step value, then when indexed by a usize
it should return start + idx * step
:
pub struct MyStruct {
pub start: f64,
pub step: f64,
}
My intuition is that I'd simply be able to take the signature of Index
and plug in my types:
impl Index<usize> for MyStruct {
type Output = f64;
fn index(&self, idx: usize) -> &f64 {
self.start + (idx as f64) * self.step
}
}
This gives the error mismatched types
saying expected type &f64, found type f64
. As someone who has yet to fully understand how Rust's type system works, I tried simply slapping &
on the expression:
fn index(&self, idx: usize) -> &f64 {
&(self.start + (idx as f64) * self.step)
}
This now tells me that the borrowed value does not live long enough
, so maybe it needs a lifetime variable?
fn index<'a>(&self, idx: usize) -> &'a f64 {
&(self.start + (idx as f64) * self.step)
}
The error is the same, but the note now gives lifetime 'a
instead of lifetime #1
, so I guess that's not necessary, but at this point I feel like I'm stuck. I'm confused that such a simple exercise for most languages has become so difficult to implement in Rust, since all I want to do is return a computation from a function that happens to be behind a reference. How should I go about implementing Index
for a simple structure where the value is calculated on demand?
The
Index
trait is meant to return a borrowed pointer to a member ofself
(e.g. an item in aVec
). The signature of theindex
method from theIndex
trait makes it impractical to implement it to have the behavior you described, as you'd have to store every value returned byindex
inself
and ensure that the pointers remain valid until theMyStruct
is dropped.This use case does not match the intuition for
Index
. When I seemyStruct[3]
, my intuition is that, just as for arrays, I'm getting a pointer to some already-initialized data. The interface forIndex
corroborates this intuition.I can see two things that you might potentially be trying to achieve:
In this case I would recommend against the premise of implementing
Index
and just provide a method that returns af64
instead of an&f64
like so.You don't get the operators, which is good because somebody reading
[]
would be mislead into thinking they were getting a pointer. But you do get the functionality you want. Depending on your use cases you may want to rename this method.MyStruct
to a parameter withIndex
bounds.This is trickier with good reason.
Index
expects the data to be there before it asks for it. You can't generate and return it becauseindex
returnsf64
, and you can't generate it in the datastructure and return a pointer because it doesn't take a&mut self
. You'd have to populate these values before the call toindex
. Some redesign would be in order, and the direction of that redesign would depend on the larger context of your problem.