I want to filter elements from a list of lists, and iterate over the elements of each element using a lambda. For example, given the list:
a = [[1,2,3],[4,5,6]]
suppose that I want to keep only elements where the sum of the list is greater than N. I tried writing:
filter(lambda x, y, z: x + y + z >= N, a)
but I get the error:
<lambda>() takes exactly 3 arguments (1 given)
How can I iterate while assigning values of each element to x, y, and z? Something like zip, but for arbitrarily long lists.
thanks,
p.s. I know I can write this using: filter(lambda x: sum(x)..., a) but that's not the point, imagine that these were not numbers but arbitrary elements and I wanted to assign their values to variable names.
Use a function instead of a lambda, then
myVar = a[0]
, etc.Ok, obviously you know that you can use
sum
. The goal of what you are trying to do seems a bit vague, but I think that the optional parameter syntax might help you out, or at least give you some inspiration. If you place a*
before a parameter, it creates a tuple of all of itself and all of the remaining parameters. If you place a**
before it, you get a dictionary.To see this:
prints
You can use this syntax with
lambda
too.Like I said, I'm not sure exactly what you are trying to do, but it sounds like this might help. I don't think you can get local variable assignments in
lambda
without some hacking, but maybe you can use this to assign the values to variables somehow.Edit: Ah, I understand what you are looking for moreso now. I think you want:
You can explicitly name the sublist elements (assuming there's always a fixed number of them), by giving lambda a tuple as its argument:
If you specify "lambda i, j, k" as you tried to do, you're saying lambda will receive three arguments. But filter will give lambda each element of a, that is, one sublist at a time (thus the error you got). By enclosing the arguments to lambda in parenthesis, you're saying that lambda will receive one argument, but you're also naming each of its components.
Try something like this:
Using
lambda
withfilter
is sort of silly when we have other techniques available.In this case I would probably solve the specific problem this way (or using the equivalent generator expression)
or, if I needed to unpack, like
If I really needed a function, I could use argument tuple unpacking (which is removed in Python 3.x, by the way, since people don't use it much):
lambda (x, y, z): x + y + z
takes a tuple and unpacks its three items asx
,y
, andz
. (Note that you can also use this indef
, i.e.:def f((x, y, z)): return x + y + z
.)You can, of course, use assignment style unpacking (
def f(item): x, y, z = item; return x + y + z
) and indexing (lambda item: item[0] + item[1] + item[2]
) in all versions of Python.You can do something like
Using the deconstruction syntax.