{var%20f='http://v.t.sina.com.cn/share/share.php?appkey=1515056452',u=z||d.location,p=['&url=',e(u),'&title=',e(t||d.title),'&source=',e(r),'&sourceUrl=',e(l),'&content=',c||'gb2312','&pic=',e(p||'')].join('');function%20a(){if(!window.open([f,p].join(''),'mb',['toolbar=0,status=0,resizable=1,width=440,height=430,left=',(s.width-440)/2,',top=',(s.height-430)/2].join('')))u.href=[f,p].join('');};if(/Firefox/.test(navigator.userAgent))setTimeout(a,0);else%20a();})(screen,document,encodeURIComponent,'','','https://www.manongdao.com/data/attach/logo/logo.png', '推荐 你好瞎i 的问题《Alternative to Webbrowser control》','https://www.manongdao.com/q-160527.html','页面编码gb2312|utf-8默认gb2312'));){kind=link}
Has anyone found and used an alternative to the Microsoft Webbroswer ActiveX control with any success? The open source Firefox ActiveX version seems to be a dead project development wise and based on an old Firefox version.
相关问题
- TestCafe - The browser always starts in clean slat
- UrlEncodeUnicode and browser navigation errors
- Character Encoding in iframes
- How to load local *.htm file to WPF WebBroswer wit
- SQLite Storage in Firefox 3.0 +
相关文章
Give a look to the GeckoFX Project, an open-source component for embedding Mozilla Gecko (Firefox) in .NET applications.
screenshot http://geckofx.googlecode.com/files/geckofx-screenshot.png