On - [removed].hash - Change?

2018-12-31 02:07发布

I am using Ajax and hash for navigation.

Is there a way to check if the window.location.hash changed like this?

http://example.com/blah#123 to http://example.com/blah#456

It works if I check it when the document loads.

But if I have #hash based navigation it doesn't work when I press the back button on the browser (so I jump from blah#456 to blah#123).

It shows inside the address box, but I can't catch it with JavaScript.

13条回答
刘海飞了
2楼-- · 2018-12-31 02:19
var page_url = 'http://www.yoursite.com/'; // full path leading up to hash;
var current_url_w_hash = page_url + window.location.hash; // now you might have something like: http://www.yoursite.com/#123

function TrackHash() {
    if (document.location != page_url + current_url_w_hash) {
        window.location = document.location;
    }
    return false;
}
var RunTabs = setInterval(TrackHash, 200);

That's it... now, anytime you hit your back or forward buttons, the page will reload as per the new hash value.

查看更多
素衣白纱
3楼-- · 2018-12-31 02:23

I've been using path.js for my client side routing. I've found it to be quite succinct and lightweight (it's also been published to NPM too), and makes use of hash based navigation.

path.js NPM

path.js GitHub

查看更多
长期被迫恋爱
4楼-- · 2018-12-31 02:31

You could easily implement an observer (the "watch" method) on the "hash" property of "window.location" object.

Firefox has its own implementation for watching changes of object, but if you use some other implementation (such as Watch for object properties changes in JavaScript) - for other browsers, that will do the trick.

The code will look like this:

window.location.watch(
    'hash',
    function(id,oldVal,newVal){
        console.log("the window's hash value has changed from "+oldval+" to "+newVal);
    }
);

Then you can test it:

var myHashLink = "home";
window.location = window.location + "#" + myHashLink;

And of course that will trigger your observer function.

查看更多
人气声优
5楼-- · 2018-12-31 02:33

HTML5 specifies a hashchange event. This event is now supported by all modern browsers. Support was added in the following browser versions:

  • Internet Explorer 8
  • Firefox 3.6
  • Chrome 5
  • Safari 5
  • Opera 10.6
查看更多
伤终究还是伤i
6楼-- · 2018-12-31 02:35

I was using this in a react application to make the URL display different parameters depending what view the user was on.

I watched the hash parameter using

window.addEventListener('hashchange', doSomethingWithChangeFunction());

Then

doSomethingWithChangeFunction () { 
    // Get new hash value
    let urlParam = window.location.hash;
    // Do something with new hash value
};

Worked a treat, works with forward and back browser buttons and also in browser history.

查看更多
听够珍惜
7楼-- · 2018-12-31 02:38

The only way to really do this (and is how the 'reallysimplehistory' does this), is by setting an interval that keeps checking the current hash, and comparing it against what it was before, we do this and let subscribers subscribe to a changed event that we fire if the hash changes.. its not perfect but browsers really don't support this event natively.


Update to keep this answer fresh:

If you are using jQuery (which today should be somewhat foundational for most) then a nice solution is to use the abstraction that jQuery gives you by using its events system to listen to hashchange events on the window object.

$(window).on('hashchange', function() {
  //.. work ..
});

The nice thing here is you can write code that doesn't need to even worry about hashchange support, however you DO need to do some magic, in form of a somewhat lesser known jQuery feature jQuery special events.

With this feature you essentially get to run some setup code for any event, the first time somebody attempts to use the event in any way (such as binding to the event).

In this setup code you can check for native browser support and if the browser doesn't natively implement this, you can setup a single timer to poll for changes, and trigger the jQuery event.

This completely unbinds your code from needing to understand this support problem, the implementation of a special event of this kind is trivial (to get a simple 98% working version), but why do that when somebody else has already.

查看更多
登录 后发表回答