How to return only the Date from a SQL Server Date

Question

SELECT GETDATE()

Returns: 2008-09-22 15:24:13.790

I want that date part without the time part: 2008-09-22 00:00:00.000

How can I get that?

Answer 1

Try this:

SELECT CONVERT(VARCHAR(10),GETDATE(),111)

The above statement converts your current format to YYYY/MM/DD, please refer to this link to choose your preferable format.

Answer 2

SELECT DATEADD(DD, DATEDIFF(DD, 0, GETDATE()), 0)

SELECT DATEADD(DAY, 0, DATEDIFF(DAY,0, GETDATE()))

SELECT CONVERT(DATETIME, CONVERT(VARCHAR(10), GETDATE(), 101))

Edit: The first two methods are essentially the same, and out perform the convert to varchar method.

Answer 3

SELECT CONVERT(VARCHAR,DATEADD(DAY,-1,GETDATE()),103) --21/09/2011

SELECT CONVERT(VARCHAR,DATEADD(DAY,-1,GETDATE()),101) --09/21/2011

SELECT CONVERT(VARCHAR,DATEADD(DAY,-1,GETDATE()),111) --2011/09/21

SELECT CONVERT(VARCHAR,DATEADD(DAY,-1,GETDATE()),107) --Sep 21, 2011

Answer 4

SQLServer 2008 now has a 'date' data type which contains only a date with no time component. Anyone using SQLServer 2008 and beyond can do the following:

SELECT CONVERT(date, GETDATE())

Answer 5

IF you want to use CONVERT and get the same output as in the original question posed, that is, yyyy-mm-dd then use CONVERT(varchar(10),[SourceDate as dateTime],121) same code as the previous couple answers, but the code to convert to yyyy-mm-dd with dashes is 121.

If I can get on my soapbox for a second, this kind of formatting doesn't belong in the data tier, and that's why it wasn't possible without silly high-overhead 'tricks' until SQL Server 2008 when actual datepart data types are introduced. Making such conversions in the data tier is a huge waste of overhead on your DBMS, but more importantly, the second you do something like this, you have basically created in-memory orphaned data that I assume you will then return to a program. You can't put it back in to another 3NF+ column or compare it to anything typed without reverting, so all you've done is introduced points of failure and removed relational reference.

You should ALWAYS go ahead and return your dateTime data type to the calling program and in the PRESENTATION tier, make whatever adjustments are necessary. As soon as you go converting things before returning them to the caller, you are removing all hope of referential integrity from the application. This would prevent an UPDATE or DELETE operation, again, unless you do some sort of manual reversion, which again is exposing your data to human/code/gremlin error when there is no need.

Answer 6

I favor the following which wasn't mentioned:

DATEFROMPARTS(DATEPART(yyyy, @mydatetime), DATEPART(mm, @mydatetime), DATEPART(dd, @mydatetime))

It also doesn't care about local or do a double convert -- although each 'datepart' probably does math. So it may be a little slower than the datediff method, but to me it is much more clear. Especially when I want to group by just the year and month (set the day to 1).