Im trying to learn comparator in java and I have found this great example online, my question is how would this code be changed so that the pet names are ordered by age and in descending order so that the oldest is first and youngest is last?
class Dog implements Comparator<Dog>, Comparable<Dog>{
private String name;
private int age;
Dog(){
}
Dog(String n, int a){
name = n;
age = a;
}
public String getDogName(){
return name;
}
public int getDogAge(){
return age;
}
// Overriding the compareTo method
public int compareTo(Dog d){
return (this.name).compareTo(d.name);
}
// Overriding the compare method to sort the age
public int compare(Dog d, Dog d1){
return d.age - d1.age;
}
}
public class Example{
public static void main(String args[]){
// Takes a list o Dog objects
List<Dog> list = new ArrayList<Dog>();
list.add(new Dog("Shaggy",3));
list.add(new Dog("Lacy",2));
list.add(new Dog("Roger",10));
list.add(new Dog("Tommy",4));
list.add(new Dog("Tammy",1));
Collections.sort(list);// Sorts the array list
for(Dog a: list)//printing the sorted list of names
System.out.print(a.getDogName() + ", ");
// Sorts the array list using comparator
Collections.sort(list, new Dog());
System.out.println(" ");
for(Dog a: list)//printing the sorted list of ages
System.out.print(a.getDogName() +" : "+
a.getDogAge() + ", ");
}
}
With Java 8 you can use :
One simple way is
On a side note, Dog should really not implement
Comparator
. It means you have to do strange things likeRather you should make Compartors as separate classes.
eg.
This has the added benefit that you can use the name of the class to say how the Comparator will sort the list. eg.
You should also not not have Dog implement
Comparable
. TheComparable
interface is used to denote that there is some inherent and natural way to order these objects (such as for numbers and strings). Now this is not the case for Dog objects as sometimes you may wish to sort by age and sometimes you may wish to sort by name.Just replace:
By:
Or invert to reverse the list:
EDIT:
Fixed the "memory problem".
Indeed, the better solution is change the
age
field in theDog
class toInteger
, because there many benefits, like thenull
possibility...Simply changing
to
should sort them in the reverse order of age if that is what you are looking for.
Update:
@Arian is right in his comments, one of the accepted ways of declaring a comparator for a dog would be where you declare it as a public static final field in the class itself.
You could then use it any where in your code where you would like to compare dogs as follows:
Another important thing to remember when implementing Comparable is that it is important that compareTo performs consistently with equals. Although it is not required, failing to do so could result in strange behaviour on some collections such as some implementations of Sets. See this post for more information on sound principles of implementing compareTo.
Update 2: Chris is right, this code is susceptible to overflows for large negative values of age. The correct way to implement this in Java 7 and up would be
Integer.compare(d.age, d1.age)
instead ofd.age - d1.age
.Update 3: With Java 8, your Comparator could be written a lot more succinctly as:
The syntax for
Collections.sort
stays the same, butcompare
can be written asIf you have access to the Java 8 Comparable API,
Comparable.comparingToInt()
may be of use. (See Java 8 Comparable Documentation).For example, a
Comparator<Dog>
to sortDog
instances descending by age could be created with the following:Comparable.comparingToInt(Dog::getDogAge).reversed();
The function take a lambda mapping
T
toInteger
, and creates an ascending comparator. The chained function.reversed()
turns the ascending comparator into a descending comparator.Note: while this may not be useful for most versions of Android out there, I came across this question while searching for similar information for a non-Android Java application. I thought it might be useful to others in the same spot to see what I ended up settling on.