I just discovered that the RAND() function, while undocumented, works in BigQuery. I was able to generate a (seemingly) random sample of 10 words from the Shakespeare dataset using:
SELECT word FROM
(SELECT rand() as random,word FROM [publicdata:samples.shakespeare] ORDER BY random)
LIMIT 10
My question is: Are there any disadvantages to using this approach instead of the HASH() method defined in the "Advanced examples" section of the reference manual? https://developers.google.com/bigquery/query-reference
Great to know RAND() is available!
In my case I needed a predefined sample size. Instead of needing to know the total number of rows and do the division sample size over total rows, I'm using the following query:
Summarizing, I use ORDER BY + LIMIT to ramdomize and then extract a defined number of samples.
One additional tip to make it even simpler: You can order by the function it self, ie:
select x from y order by rand() limit 100
=> Sample of 100
For stratified sampling, check https://stackoverflow.com/a/52901452/132438
Good job finding it :). I requested the function recently, but it hasn't made it to documentation yet.
I would say the advantage of RAND() is that the results will vary, while HASH() will keep giving you the same results for the same values (not guaranteed over time, but you get the idea).
In case you want the variability that RAND() brings while still getting consistent results - you can seed it with an integer, as in RAND(3).
Notice though that the example you pasted is doing a full sort of the random values - for sufficiently big inputs this approach won't scale.
A scalable approach, to get around 10 random rows:
(where 10 is the approximate number of results I want to get, and 164656 the number of rows that table has)
standardSQL update:
or even: