C# numeric enum value as string

2019-01-16 13:40发布

I have the following enum:

public enum Urgency {
    VeryHigh = 1,
    High     = 2,
    Routine  = 4
}

I can fetch an enum "value" as string like this:

((int)Urgency.Routine).ToString() // returns "4"  

Note: This is different from:

Urgency.Routine.ToString() // returns "Routine"
(int)Urgency.Routine       // returns 4

Is there a way I can create an extension class, or a static utliity class, that would provide some syntactical sugar? :)

7条回答
贪生不怕死
2楼-- · 2019-01-16 14:16

If you wanted, you could make the extension method work for all enums:

public static string ToValueString(this Enum enumValue) 
{
    if (enumValue.GetType().GetEnumUnderlyingType() == typeof(int))
        return ((int)(object)enumValue).ToString();
    else if (enumValue.GetType().GetEnumUnderlyingType() == typeof(byte))
        return ((byte)(object)enumValue).ToString();
    ... 
}        
查看更多
ら.Afraid
3楼-- · 2019-01-16 14:23

You should just be able to use the overloads of Enums ToString method to give it a format string, this will print out the value of the enum as a string.

public static class Program
{
    static void Main(string[] args)
    {
        var val = Urgency.High;
        Console.WriteLine(val.ToString("D")); 
    }
}

public enum Urgency 
{ 
    VeryHigh = 1,
    High = 2,
    Low = 4
}
查看更多
▲ chillily
4楼-- · 2019-01-16 14:23

Great stuff ... I have now added an extension method to my project

public static class EnumExtensions 
{ 
    public static string NumberString(this Enum enVal) 
    { 
        return enVal.ToString("D"); 
    }
} 

Now I can get the int value - as a string - by calling Urgency.Routine.NumberString(); Thanks to Frankentosh and Jon :)

查看更多
We Are One
5楼-- · 2019-01-16 14:24

How about a little reflection? Should work with all underlying types.

public static class EnumTools
{
    public static string ToRawValueString(this Enum e)
    {
        return e
            .GetType()
            .GetFields(BindingFlags.Public | BindingFlags.Static)
            .First(f => f.Name==e.ToString())
            .GetRawConstantValue()
            .ToString();
    }
}

Then:

Console.WriteLine(Urgency.High.ToRawValueString()); //Writes "2"
查看更多
戒情不戒烟
6楼-- · 2019-01-16 14:39

In order to achieve more "human readable" descriptions for enums (e.g. "Very High" rather than "VeryHigh" in your example) I have decorated enum values with attribute as follows:

public enum MeasurementType
{
    Each,

    [DisplayText("Lineal Metres")]
    LinealMetre,

    [DisplayText("Square Metres")]
    SquareMetre,

    [DisplayText("Cubic Metres")]
    CubicMetre,

    [DisplayText("Per 1000")]
    Per1000,

    Other
}


public class DisplayText : Attribute
{

    public DisplayText(string Text)
    {
        this.text = Text;
    }


    private string text;


    public string Text
    {
        get { return text; }
        set { text = value; }
    }
}

Then, used an extension method like this:

    public static string ToDescription(this Enum en)
    {

        Type type = en.GetType();

        MemberInfo[] memInfo = type.GetMember(en.ToString());

        if (memInfo != null && memInfo.Length > 0)
        {

            object[] attrs = memInfo[0].GetCustomAttributes(
                                          typeof(DisplayText),

                                          false);

            if (attrs != null && attrs.Length > 0)

                return ((DisplayText)attrs[0]).Text;

        }

        return en.ToString();

    }

You can then just call

myEnum.ToDescription()
in order to display your enum as more readable text.

查看更多
唯我独甜
7楼-- · 2019-01-16 14:42

If you want to just deal with this enum, use Mark Byer's solution.

For a more general solution:

public static string NumberString(this Enum enVal) 
{
    return Convert.ToDecimal(enVal).ToString("0");
}

Converting to decimal means you don't need to deal with the 8 different allowed underlying integral types explicitly, as all of them convert losslessly to decimal but not to each other (ulong and long don't convert losslessly between each other but both can handle all the rest). Doing that would probably be faster (esp. if you pick well in your order of comparison), but a lot more verbose for relatively little gain.

Edit:

The above isn't as good as Frankentosh's though, Frankentosh saw through the question to the real problem and solves it very eloquently.

查看更多
登录 后发表回答