Is it a good idea to put all project headers into

Question

I talked to my instructor the other day and asked him this question. He told me that I could go for smaller projects, but I'm starting a chess program and I was wondering what Stack Overflow thinks about this issue. Should I include all headers into one file, or separate them?

Answer 1

It's a bad idea in general, because you can have dependencies you'll not be able to solve in this case.

But it's usually a good idea to create a header file with all base headers you are using from different libraries or your own header (with structs and data types definitions).

Answer 2

Normally, you want separate headers.

Including more than necessary does a few potentially bad things.

1. This is single greatest cause of slow compile times. Unnecessary inclusion of extra headers slows down compilation, since each source file has to worry about more info than it needs. It starts as a small problem, and before you know it hundreds of developers are wasting dozens to hundreds of hours each because the problem got too far out of hand to fix. Even though you're working on small problems, it's important to understand proper separation of headers - it's easy to get right the first time but very hard to fix later if you ignore it.

2. You lose the ability (depending on compiler/IDE) to correctly handle dependencies, and wind up building more information than you need to build.

3. You lose maintainability. It's more difficult to maintain software when you have large, single files, than when you have lots of small, concise files.

4. You make the code more difficult to understand, hence more prone to bugs. By having everything in one file, it's easier to get "lost" in the huge header.

Answer 3

There are some times when this practice is useful:

1. Pre-compiled header files with code that really doesn't change that often.

2. APIs

Answer 4

There's no one-way-fits-all solution. Arrange your headers how it makes the most sense. 90+% of the time, that means that each module includes only the headers it needs. However, some programs have little isolation of the data structures between modules—that could mean that there is a use for

#include "alltheheaders.h"

Answer 5

You should keep the number of headers included in any source (*.cpp, *.cc etc.) file to the minimum required to compile that file. Including extra headers will increase compile times. You should also try and reduce the number of includes in your headers - you can do this by forward declaring classes rather than including their headers.

e.g. The following code has an unnecessary include in the header

Example.hh

#include "SomeClass.hh"

void SomeFunction(SomeClass const& obj);

Example.cc

#include "Example.hh"

void SomeFunction(SomeClass const& obj)
{
   // code here
}

It can be written as to move the include from the header to the source file

Example.hh

class SomeClass;

void SomeFunction(SomeClass const& obj);

Example.cc

#include "Example.hh"
#include "SomeClass.hh"

void SomeFunction(SomeClass const& obj)
{
   // code here
}

Answer 6

For a smaller project you'll never notice the difference. However, once your project reaches significant scale, stick by the old adage, "Only reference headers in files that are directly using them". If you have myclass.cpp and myclass.h, and myclass.h doesn't directly need a specific header, reference it in the cpp.

This may take more time, but best practice is always worth the time.