I'm looking for a way to create a Boost.Fusion sequence wrapper that is itself a Fusion sequence and forwards all 'calls' to its wrapped sequence. Something in the lines of
template< typename Sequence >
struct sequence_wrapper
{
explicit sequence_wrapper( Sequence const& s ) : seq( s ){}
Sequence seq;
};
where sequence_wrapper< Sequence >
is a Fusion sequence as well, and works just as Sequence
would. The reason I need this is that I have several functions that operate on Fusion sequences (where all elements satisfy some special requirements), and I would like to add some syntax sugar for which I need a custom type to add overloaded operators to. I do not need the result of operations on a sequence_wrapper to return a sequence_wrapper as well, only the syntax sugar related calls would return a (manually) wrapped sequence. For instance, appending elements to a sequence using the comma operator (somewhat of a Boost.Assign for Fusion sequences):
template< typename Sequence, typename T >
sequence_wrapper<
typename boost::fusion::result_of::push_back<
Sequence const&
, T
>::type
> operator ,( Sequence const& seq, T const& v )
{
return
sequence_wrapper<
typename boost::fusion::result_of::push_back<
Sequence const&
, T
>::type
>( boost::fusion::push_back( seq, v ) )
;
}
What would be the best way to achieve this (if it is indeed supported by the library)? I'm particularly trying to avoid creating a Fusion sequence from scratch, as I would like to use whatever sequence is returned by Fusion operations. Would inheritance + specialization of tag_of
to return the tag of the wrapped sequence just work? Or will I need to define a tag of my own and implement all required functions to just forward the call?
This is what I ended up doing: