I am currently working on rewriting a linked list module and I am receiving some weird errors.
In two IDEs (Netbeans & Visual Studio Express), I am getting a warning that malloc is undefined and that a function found in my linkedlist.c file is not defined either.
below are my 3 files.
main.c
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include "linkedlist.h"
int main(void){
struct linked_list * l_list;
l_list = new_list();
printf("%i", l_list->length);
getchar();
return (EXIT_SUCCESS);
}
linkedlist.h
#ifndef LINKEDLIST_H
#define LINKEDLIST_H
struct linked_list{
int length;
struct linked_list_node * head_node_ptr;
};
struct linked_list_node{
struct linked_list_node * prev_node_ptr;
struct linked_list_node * next_node_ptr;
struct linked_list_data * head_data_ptr;
};
struct linked_list_data{
struct linked_list_data * prev_data_ptr;
struct linked_list_data * next_data_ptr;
void * data;
};
struct linked_list * new_list();
#endif
linkedlist.c
#include "linkedlist.h"
struct linked_list * new_list(){
struct linked_list * temp_list = malloc(sizeof(struct linked_list));
temp_list->length = 5;
return temp_list;
}
Any help would be greatly appreciated. I am unsure if this is a syntax issue or missing files on my computer.
you must use
malloc()
like below:Where do you include
<stdlib.h>
— because that is wheremalloc()
is declared?Is this a compilation problem (
malloc()
undeclared) or a linking problem (malloc()
undefined)?What exactly is the error message?
Now the code is readable:
<cstdlib>
is a C++ header (so is<cstdio>
).<stdlib.h>
in C.<stdlib.h>
where themalloc()
function is used — inlinkedlist.c
.You also
havehad the header guards in the wrong place inlinkedlist.h
, but the code in the question has been updated since. Originally, the sequence was:The canonical structure for a header file is:
The
#endif
is the last non-comment, non-blank line in the file — not the third.Your data structures are extraordinarily complicated for even a doubly-linked list. Are you sure you're going to be needing the length so often that it warrants maintaining the pointer to the head in every node in the list? I'd be surprised if you are using it that often. I assume that you have the pointer-to-head in each node so that when you remove an arbitrary node from the list you can decrement the length of the list. You'd probably be better off passing a pointer to the list and the pointer to the node to be deleted than what you've got.
I can see no justification for the
length = 5
in thenew_list()
function.Also, C and C++ differ radically on the meaning of:
In C++, that means "
new_list()
is a function that takes no arguments and returns astruct linked_list
pointer".In C, that means "
new_list()
is a function with a completely indeterminate argument list that returns astruct linked_list
pointer". The function is declared, but there is no prototype for the function.In C, you should write:
Personally, I prefer to see
extern
in front of function declarations in headers; it is not actually necessary for functions, but since it (extern
) is (or should be) necessary for variables declared in headers, I prefer the symmetry for functions declared in headers.From your question, it appears you are on a Windows machine. You may have to do:
in order to have malloc() available.
cstdlib
andcstdio
are not standard C headers. Perhaps you meantstdlib.h
andstdio.h
.