DDS vs AMQP vs ZeroMQ [closed]

Question

As it currently stands, this question is not a good fit for our Q&A format. We expect answers to be supported by facts, references, or expertise, but this question will likely solicit debate, arguments, polling, or extended discussion. If you feel that this question can be improved and possibly reopened, visit the help center for guidance.

Closed 7 years ago.

I wanted a feedback on whether my evaluations and concerns are correct.

I have been reseaching the three, Data Distribution Service, AMQP and ZeroMQ for sometime now for building a data transport layer in a datacenter. All the three look promising, yet i encountered some blocking issues in few.

To give a context, my requirements are:

1. Scale upto 500+ physical nodes, 1000+ publishers and subscribers.
2. Support durable delivery of messages to take care of failing subscribers.
3. The aggregated throughput should be north of 1 Million messages / sec

Problems with AMQP:

1. The Broker architecture seems to be a bottleneck and central point of failure in the whole deployment setup. I can complicate my deployment by putting a federation and cluster to improve performance and availability of pending messages, but they still do not seem to be failproof.
2. The performance for durable queues seems to be very less. My sample application could only clock 6-7K messages / core / queue/ application.

Problems with ZeroMQ:

1. The Documentation seems to be a little wanting in depth.
2. The behavior of the system for pending messages seems to invite trouble in PUB/SUB model of communication. Please refer to : How zeromq handles slow consumers with PUB/SUB mode

OpenSplice DDS: I didnt find anything lacking in the DDS protocol except for adoption in the industry. Will like to know a first hand review on this product in terms of stability, performance or limitations.

Answer 1

I am surprised about your concerns on OpenSplice DDS adoption. OpenSplice DDS is today deployed on over several mission and business critical systems such as Naval Combat Management Systems, Military Vehicles, Air Traffic Control and Management, Metro, to High Frequency Auto-Trading. Just to give you another bit of info that should give you reassure you w.r.t. the adoption of the technology, the OMG DDS standard (the standard implemented by OpenSplice DDS) has been recommended by EUROCAE to exchange flight data plans across centers pan-european.

Let me know if you have any further questions either on the adoption or the technology.

-AC

Answer 2

Take a look at this page. Lot of industries and companies are using DDS today.