1.I can't find an elegant way to write this code:
if array.empty?
# process empty array
else
array.each do |el|
# process el
end
end
I'd like to have one loop, without writing array
twice. I read this, but there is no solution good enough.
2. I am actually in an HAML template. Same question.
- if array.empty?
%p No result
- else
%ul
- array.each do |el|
%li el
I think there is no much more elegant or readable way to write this. Any way to somehow combine an iteration with a condition will just result in blackboxed code, meaning: the condition will just most likely be hidden in an
Array
extension.Assuming that "process empty array" leaves it empty after processing, you can leave out the else:
or in one line:
The cleanest way I've seen this done in HAML (not plain Ruby) is something like:
As mentioned by other answers, there is no need for the
else
clause because that's already implied in the other logic.Even if you could do the each-else in one clean line, you wouldn't be able to achieve the markup you're trying to achieve (
<p>
if array.empty?,<ul>
if array.present?). Besides, the HAML you show in your question is the best way to tell the story behind your code, which means it will be more readable and maintainable to other developers, so I don't know why you would want to refactor into something more cryptic.An if the array is nil then we can enforce to empty array
I saw some people asking how to handle this for nil cases.
The trick is to convert it to string. All nils converted to string becomes a empty string, all empty cases continue being empty.
both will return true
What about?