Capturing Ctrl-c in ruby

2019-01-16 03:27发布

I was passed a long running legacy ruby program, which has numerous occurrences of

begin
  #dosomething
rescue Exception => e
  #halt the exception's progress
end

throughout it.

Without tracking down every single possible exception these each could be handling (at least not immediately), I'd still like to be able to shut it down at times with CtrlC.

And I'd like to do so in a way which only adds to the code (so I don't affect the existing behavior, or miss an otherwise caught exception in the middle of a run.)

[CtrlC is SIGINT, or SystemExit, which appears to be equivalent to SignalException.new("INT") in Ruby's exception handling system. class SignalException < Exception, which is why this problem comes up.]

The code I would like to have written would be:

begin
  #dosomething
rescue SignalException => e
  raise e
rescue Exception => e
  #halt the exception's progress
end

EDIT: This code works, as long as you get the class of the exception you want to trap correct. That's either SystemExit, Interrupt, or IRB::Abort as below.

5条回答
Deceive 欺骗
2楼-- · 2019-01-16 03:41

If you can wrap your whole program you can do something like the following:

 trap("SIGINT") { throw :ctrl_c }

 catch :ctrl_c do
 begin
    sleep(10)
 rescue Exception
    puts "Not printed"
 end
 end

This basically has CtrlC use catch/throw instead of exception handling, so unless the existing code already has a catch :ctrl_c in it, it should be fine.

Alternatively you can do a trap("SIGINT") { exit! }. exit! exits immediately, it does not raise an exception so the code can't accidentally catch it.

查看更多
beautiful°
3楼-- · 2019-01-16 03:43

I am using ensure to great effect! This is for things you want to have happen when your stuff ends no matter why it ends.

查看更多
我命由我不由天
4楼-- · 2019-01-16 03:52

If you can't wrap your whole application in a begin ... rescue block (e.g., Thor) you can just trap SIGINT:

trap "SIGINT" do
  puts "Exiting"
  exit 130
end

130 is a standard exit code.

查看更多
女痞
5楼-- · 2019-01-16 03:57

The problem is that when a Ruby program ends, it does so by raising SystemExit. When a control-C comes in, it raises Interrupt. Since both SystemExit and Interrupt derive from Exception, your exception handling is stopping the exit or interrupt in its tracks. Here's the fix:

Wherever you can, change

rescue Exception => e
  # ...
end

to

rescue StandardError => e
  # ...
end

for those you can't change to StandardError, re-raise the exception:

rescue Exception => e
  # ...
  raise
end

or, at the very least, re-raise SystemExit and Interrupt

rescue SystemExit, Interrupt
  raise
rescue Exception => e
  #...
end

Any custom exceptions you have made should derive from StandardError, not Exception.

查看更多
手持菜刀,她持情操
6楼-- · 2019-01-16 04:04

Handling Ctrl-C cleanly in Ruby the ZeroMQ way:

#!/usr/bin/env ruby

# Shows how to handle Ctrl-C
require 'ffi-rzmq'

context = ZMQ::Context.new(1)
socket = context.socket(ZMQ::REP)
socket.bind("tcp://*:5558")

trap("INT") { puts "Shutting down."; socket.close; context.terminate; exit}

puts "Starting up"

while true do
  message = socket.recv_string
  puts "Message: #{message.inspect}"
  socket.send_string("Message received")
end

Source

查看更多
登录 后发表回答