I'm having difficulty understanding the syntax of C++ Template Template parameters. I understand why they are useful, as per the excellent description here, I just find their syntax hard to get to understand. Two examples taken from the above website (there are others):
template <typename T, template <typename> class Cont>
class Stack;
and
template <template <typename,typename> class Cont>
class Wrapper3;
Clearly generalizing such declarations is impossible without some understanding of the rationale behind this syntax. Memorizing is harder and does not seem to be of much help.
Edit: I realize that my attempt at a question came across like an observation. What I'm asking for is help on how to interprete the Template Template parameter syntax in everyday speak. I can do this with the C++ syntax and the all the other programming languages that I've learned. However I'm having difficulty "explaining" the syntax of C++ Template Template parameters to myself. I've gotten a book, "C++ templates : the complete guide" by David Vandevoorde and Nicolai M. Josuttis, and while its a nice book, it hasn't been of much help to me in understanding this syntax which I'm sure many will agree is at best quirky.
I am not sure what is your question exactly, but here is the explanation for the two examples you gave.
Stack
is a class template with two template parameters. The first parameter,T
can be any type (including built-in types, user-defined types, template instantiations and so on). The second parameter,Cont
, must be a class template taking one parameter. The parameter is unnamed because it would not make much sense (the parameter is never bound to anything).Wrapper3
is a class template with a single parameter,Cont
.Cont
must be a class template with two parameters.The syntax to define a template template parameter is the same as the one to define a class template (
template <typename [param1], typename [param2], ...> class Name
), so I don't really understand what is your problem.However, I agree that the syntax can become a bit awkward when you start "nesting" template template parameters:
Doesn't happen that often, though...
There's nothing so arcane about it. Just take out your template template parameters from the original template:
Any class template with a single type argument fits, such as
And you would use your original template as