Inspired in this question: How to implements Iterable I decided to make a basic linked list implementation and implement an iterator in order to have a code like this:
MyList<String> myList = new MyList<String>();
myList.add("hello");
myList.add("world");
for(String s : myList) {
System.out.println(s);
}
The code wasn't hard to deal with, creating a class MyList<T> implements Iterable<T>
with a private static class Node<T>
and a private class MyListIterator<T> implements Iterator<T>
, but then I came across a problem when implementing my own version of Iterator#remove
:
class MyList<T> implements Iterable<T> {
private static class Node<T> {
//basic node implementation...
}
private Node<T> head;
private Node<T> tail;
//constructor, add methods...
private class MyListIterator<T> implements Iterator<T> {
private Node<T> headItr;
private Node<T> prevItr;
public MyListIterator(Node<T> headItr) {
this.headItr = headItr;
}
@Override
public void remove() {
//line below compiles
if (head == headItr) {
//line below compiles
head = head.getNext();
//line below doesn't and gives me the message
//"Type mismatch: cannot convert from another.main.MyList.Node<T> to
//another.main.MyList.Node<T>"
head = headItr.getNext();
//line below doesn't compile, just for testing purposes (it will be deleted)
head = headItr;
}
}
}
}
This error message raised my curiosity. I was looking on the net about this problem but found nothing (or probably I'm not so good at searching this kind of issues). What would be the reason of two variables from the same type being compared but not being assignable to each other?
By the way, I know that I can just look at the code of LinkedList
and check how the Java designers implemented this and copy/paste/adapt it to my own implementation, but I prefer to have an explanation and understanding of the real problem.
Complete code that shows my current implementation of MyList
class:
class MyList<T> implements Iterable<T> {
private static class Node<T> {
private T data;
private Node<T> next;
public Node(T data) {
super();
this.data = data;
}
public T getData() {
return data;
}
public Node<T> getNext() {
return next;
}
public void setNext(Node<T> next) {
this.next = next;
}
}
private Node<T> head;
private Node<T> tail;
private int size;
public MyList() {
head = null;
tail = null;
}
public void add(T data) {
Node<T> node = new Node<T>(data);
if (head == null) {
head = node;
tail = head;
} else {
tail.setNext(node);
tail = node;
}
size++;
}
private class MyListIterator<T> implements Iterator<T> {
private Node<T> headItr;
private Node<T> prevItr;
public MyListIterator(Node<T> headItr) {
this.headItr = headItr;
}
@Override
public boolean hasNext() {
return (headItr.getNext() != null);
}
@Override
public T next() {
T data = headItr.getData();
prevItr = headItr;
if (hasNext()) {
headItr = headItr.getNext();
}
return data;
}
@Override
public void remove() {
if (head == headItr) {
//problem here
head = headItr.getNext();
}
//implementation still under development...
}
}
@Override
public Iterator<T> iterator() {
return new MyListIterator<T>(head);
}
}
The other three are right: you need to change
private class MyListIterator<T> implements Iterator<T>
to
private class MyListIterator implements Iterator<T>
but once you do that, you will also need to change your
iterator()
method:Or else you will get another error. Once you make the second change, then it should work.
The iterator should be declared as
and not as
By declaring it as MyListIterator, its generic type T is not the same T as the T from its enclosing class.
This is the problem:
(It doesn't help that in your cut down version you've made
MyList
non-generic.)At that point there are two different
T
type variables - the one in the nested class and the one in the outer class. You don't needNode
to be generic - you just need:Now there's only one
T
- the one in the outer class. It's not like you want the list iterator to have a differentT
from the one declared in the enclosing instance, so you don't want it to be generic.To put it another way: try making
MyListIterator
generic in a type parameter with a different name, and then it'll be clearer what's going wrong, as the two names will be distinguishable in the error message. It's effectively:(or vice versa).
Remove the type parameter from the declaration of
MyListIterator
:and the call in
iterator()
In your current version the T of
MyListIterator
isn't the same T as the one inMyList
.