Ok, I have been staring at this for hours trying to figure out what's going on, to no avail. I am trying to create a ModelForm using the 'instance' keyword to pass it an existing model instance and then save it. Here is the ModelForm (stripped considerably from the original in my attempts to identify the cause of this problem):
class TempRuleFieldForm(ModelForm):
class Meta:
model = RuleField
and here is the code I'm running:
>>> m = RuleField.objects.get(pk=1)
>>> f = TempRuleFieldForm(instance=m)
>>> f.is_valid()
False
The model object (m
above) is valid and it saves just fine, but the form will not validate. Now, as far as I can tell, this code is identical to the Django docs example found here: http://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/topics/forms/modelforms/#the-save-method, though obviously I am missing something. I would greatly appreciate some fresh eyes to tell me what I've got wrong.
Thanks
If u still want to validate the object that was in the database, you can serialize it first and then create the Form with it.
This is probably not the best way to do it but the only one that I have found to get a bound form from a model. I need it because I want to validate the current data in the database. I create a question since I don't think this is the best way of doing it:
Transform an unbound form to a bound one?
Note that your link doesn't call
f.is_valid()
, it just saves directly. This is potentially a bit misleading.The point is that instantiating a form with just an
instance
parameter but nodata
does not bind it to data, and the form is therefore not valid. You will see thatf.is_bound
is False.Behind the scenes,
instance
is really just the same as passinginitial
data, which as the docs note is only used to display the data initially and is not used for saving. You would probably benefit from reading the notes on bound and unbound forms.Not so much a solution for OP but this was a problem I ran into, specifically when running unit tests on ModelForms, it was a nuisance to keep on having to bind the form then also define an instance with the very same data. I created a small helper function to make things easier which others may find useful — I'm only using this for testing purposes and would be cautious to deploy it anywhere else without significant tweaks (if at all)
This isn't a solution for OP, but it is for the post title, which is quite high in Google. So I'll post it anyway, from here:
If you're already giving request.POST to your form using
request.POST or None
, but it's still invalid without errors, check that there isn't any redirect going on. A redirect loses your POST data and your form will be invalid with no errors because it's unbound.