{var%20f='http://v.t.sina.com.cn/share/share.php?appkey=1515056452',u=z||d.location,p=['&url=',e(u),'&title=',e(t||d.title),'&source=',e(r),'&sourceUrl=',e(l),'&content=',c||'gb2312','&pic=',e(p||'')].join('');function%20a(){if(!window.open([f,p].join(''),'mb',['toolbar=0,status=0,resizable=1,width=440,height=430,left=',(s.width-440)/2,',top=',(s.height-430)/2].join('')))u.href=[f,p].join('');};if(/Firefox/.test(navigator.userAgent))setTimeout(a,0);else%20a();})(screen,document,encodeURIComponent,'','','https://www.manongdao.com/data/attach/logo/logo.png', '推荐 Deceive 欺骗 的问题《webjure vs compojure?》','https://www.manongdao.com/q-1334119.html','页面编码gb2312|utf-8默认gb2312'));){kind=link}
I've heard of two Clojure based web application frameworks: Webjure and Compojure. Can someone let me know which is better?
相关问题
- Better Sequence Duplicate Remover
- Installation of Leiningen 2.X in Mac OS X
- Questions about Lists and other stuff in Clojure
- How do I add CORS to a compojure-api app?
- How do I use Clojure in Android Studio using Gracl
相关文章
- Factor Clojure code setting many different fields
- Does learning one Lisp help in learning the other?
- Better way to nest if-let in clojure
- Idiomatic approach for structuring Clojure source
- Is a “transparent” macrolet possible?
- Detect operating system in Clojure
- Using quote in Clojure
- Enums and Clojure
Compojure seems to be getting the most buzz right now. Not necessarily indicative of quality, but the one with the most eyes will probably evolve the fastest.
I've been building a project for my own use using Compojure and it has worked out great. It doesn't really get in the way very much and lets you focus on what's important, your problem domain. The project is about 1100 lines of clojure just to give you an idea of the size.
Now you can add Ring to the list. All of these frameworks are very new and likely to evolve (or die) quickly, but Compojure does seem to be the most actively developed based on the past 6 months or so.
"Better" is too subjective a question to get a definitive answer to. Try them all and see what works.
Compojure is based on Ring, which is a low-level framework that doesn't attempt to hide much of HTTP. It's similar to WSGI (Python) or Rack (Ruby). Ring has a concept of middleware, small pieces of code that can do something meaningful with an HTTP request and/or response, such as dump header infos, manage cookies etc. Compojure is a higher-level framework, somewhat similar to Ruby's Sinatra. Its aim is to provide a convenient API (or DSL, if you prefer) for most tasks a Web app developer faces. It's usually used together with an HTML generation library, such as Hiccup.
I haven't heard much about Webjure in the last few months, I'm not sure it's in active development (but I'd be interested to find out more). It precedes Ring, AFAICT, which seems to have become somewhat of a standard for Clojure Web frameworks.
I second Rayne's recommendation on Moustache.
Right now, we are using Ring (base layer, middleware), Moustache (routing), Hiccup (html generation). We just began using Compass for CSS (http://compass-style.org/). So far, I'm happy with this collection of small libraries rather than a big "complete stack" framework (Django, Rails, ect...).
Now, there is also a new one named Noir build on top of compojure. Really recommended, especially with Heroku.