When its container has a display for flex, what is the difference between setting an element to be flex: 50% and width: 50%. The outcome appears to be the same:
ul {
display: flex;
flex-flow: row wrap;
}
.table a {
flex: 50%;
background: grey;
}
.table2 a {
width: 50%;
background: grey;
}
<ul class="table">
<a href="#">ad ds fdsaf dsfa dsfj dsf dsfj lkdsjflkdsa jflkdsja lkfjdslkjfldska jlkfdsajlkdjslkajflkd sjalkfjdslkjdsalkjdlakjfldksjflkdsjflkdsjd fdsd</a>
<a href="#">b</a>
<a href="#">c</a>
<a href="#">d</a>
</ul>
<ul class="table2">
<a href="#">ad ds fdsaf dsfa dsfj dsf dsfj lkdsjflkdsa jflkdsja lkfjdslkjfldska jlkfdsajlkdjslkajflkd sjalkfjdslkjdsalkjdlakjfldksjflkdsjflkdsjd fdsd</a>
<a href="#">b</a>
<a href="#">c</a>
<a href="#">d</a>
</ul>
There is no effective difference in this instance.
In fact, it's because
flex
is shorthand forflex-grow
,flex-shrink
andflex-basis
combined.flex-basis
defines the default size of an element before the remaining space is distributed.So in this case, you have defined all
a
children` to 50%.Reference Article: http://css-tricks.com/snippets/css/a-guide-to-flexbox/