Problems with LD_PRELOAD and calloc() interpositio

2020-06-04 11:32发布

Relating to a previous question of mine

I've successfully interposed malloc, but calloc seems to be more problematic.

That is with certain hosts, calloc gets stuck in an infinite loop with a possible internal calloc call inside dlsym. However, a basic test host does not exhibit this behaviour, but my system's "ls" command does.

Here's my code:

// build with: g++ -O2 -Wall -fPIC -ldl -o libnano.so -shared Main.cc
#include <stdio.h>
#include <dlfcn.h>

bool gNanoUp = false;// global

// Function types
typedef void* (*MallocFn)(size_t size);
typedef void* (*CallocFn)(size_t elements, size_t size);

struct MemoryFunctions {
    MallocFn   mMalloc;
    CallocFn   mCalloc;
};

MemoryFunctions orgMemFuncs;

// Save original methods.
void __attribute__((constructor)) __nano_init(void) {
    fprintf(stderr, "NANO: init()\n");

    // Get address of original functions
    orgMemFuncs.mMalloc = (MallocFn)dlsym(RTLD_NEXT, "malloc");
    orgMemFuncs.mCalloc = (CallocFn)dlsym(RTLD_NEXT, "calloc");

    fprintf(stderr, "NANO: malloc() found @%p\n", orgMemFuncs.mMalloc);
    fprintf(stderr, "NANO: calloc() found @%p\n", orgMemFuncs.mCalloc);

    gNanoUp = true;
}

// replacement functions
extern "C" {
    void *malloc(size_t size) {
        if (!gNanoUp) __nano_init();
        return orgMemFuncs.mMalloc(size);
    }

    void* calloc(size_t elements, size_t size) {
        if (!gNanoUp) __nano_init();
        return orgMemFuncs.mCalloc(elements, size);
    }
}

Now, When I do the following, I get an infinite loop followed by a seg fault, eg:

% setenv LD_PRELOAD "./libnano.so"
% ls
...
NANO: init()
NANO: init()
NANO: init()
Segmentation fault (core dumped)

However if I comment out the calloc interposer, it almost seems to work:

% setenv LD_PRELOAD "./libnano.so"
% ls
NANO: init()
NANO: malloc() found @0x3b36274dc0
NANO: calloc() found @0x3b362749e0
NANO: init()
NANO: malloc() found @0x3b36274dc0
NANO: calloc() found @0x3b362749e0
<directory contents>
...

So somethings up with "ls" that means init() gets called twice.

EDIT Note that the following host program works correctly - init() is only called once, and calloc is successfully interposed, as you can see from the output.

// build with: g++ test.cc -o test
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>

int main(int argc, char* argv[]) {

    void* p = malloc(123);
    printf("HOST p=%p\n", p);
    free(p);

    char* c = new char;
    printf("HOST c=%p\n", c);
    delete c;

    void* ca = calloc(10,10);
    printf("HOST ca=%p\n", ca);
    free(ca);
}

% setenv LD_PRELOAD "./libnano.so"
% ./test 
NANO: init()
NANO: malloc() found @0x3b36274dc0
NANO: calloc() found @0x3b362749e0
HOST p=0x601010
HOST c=0x601010
HOST ca=0x601030

4条回答
你好瞎i
2楼-- · 2020-06-04 12:18

Using dlsym based hooking can result in crashes, as dlsym calls back into the memory allocator. Instead use malloc hooks, as I suggested in your prior question; these can be installed without actually invoking dlsym at all.

查看更多
爷的心禁止访问
3楼-- · 2020-06-04 12:19

With regard to __nano_init() being called twice: You've declared the function as a constructor, so it's called when the library is loaded, and it's called a second time explicitly when your malloc() and calloc() implementations are first called. Pick one.

With regard to the calloc() interposer crashing your application: Some of the functions you're using, including dlsym() and fprintf(), may themselves be attempting to allocate memory, calling your interposer functions. Consider the consequences, and act accordingly.

查看更多
混吃等死
4楼-- · 2020-06-04 12:19

You can get away with a preliminary poor calloc that simply returns NULL. This actually works on Linux, YMMV.

static void* poor_calloc(size_t nmemb, size_t size)
{
    // So dlsym uses calloc internally, which will lead to infinite recursion, since our calloc calls dlsym.
    // Apparently dlsym can cope with slightly wrong calloc, see for further explanation:
    // http://blog.bigpixel.ro/2010/09/interposing-calloc-on-linux
    return NULL; // This is a poor implementation of calloc!
}
查看更多
兄弟一词,经得起流年.
5楼-- · 2020-06-04 12:31

I know I am a bit late (6 years). But I wanted to override calloc() today and faced a problem because dlsym() internally uses calloc(). I solved it using a simple technique and thought of sharing it here:

static unsigned char buffer[8192];

void *calloc(size_t nmemb, size_t size)
{
    if (calloc_ptr == NULL) // obtained from dlsym
            return buffer;

    init(); // uses dlsym() to find address of the real calloc()

    return calloc_ptr(len);
}

void free(void *in)
{
    if (in == buffer)
        return;

    free_ptr(in);
}

buffer satisfies the need of dlsym() till the real calloc() has been located and my calloc_ptr function pointer initialized.

查看更多
登录 后发表回答