I have something like this:
class X():
def __init__(self):
self.__name = None
def _process_value(self, value):
# do something
pass
def get_name(self):
return self.__name
def set_name(self, value):
self.__name = self._process_value(value)
name = property(get_name, set_name)
Can I replace get_name
and set_name
using lambda functions?
I've tried this:
name = property(lambda self: self.__name, lambda self, value: self.__name = self.process_value(value))
but compiler doesn't like my setter function.
If you are extending a
list
, you can also use__setitem__
, like this:Your problem is that lambda's body must be an expression and assignment is a statement (a strong, deep distinction in Python). If you insist on perpetrating
lambda
s you'll meet many such cases and learn the workarounds (there's usually one, though not always), such as, in this case:i.e. use the built-in
setattr
(which is a function and thus acceptable in alambda
's body) rather than assignment (which is a statement and thus unacceptable in alambda
's body).You also need to perform the name-mangling for the dual-underscore attribute manually (changing
__name
to_X__name
as you're in class X) where the attribute name is presented as a quoted string, as it must be insetattr
, as the Pyhon compiler only does the name mangling in question for suitable identifiers, not for string literals.