Given a list of strings, what is the best method for concatenating these strings into a comma separated list with no comma at the end. (VB.NET or C#) (Using either StringBuilder or String Concat.)
Dim strResult As String = ""
Dim lstItems As New List(Of String)
lstItems.Add("Hello")
lstItems.Add("World")
For Each strItem As String In lstItems
If strResult.Length > 0 Then
strResult = strResult & ", "
End If
strResult = strResult & strItem
Next
MessageBox.Show(strResult)
Like this:
If you want to ignore empty strings as in your example:
The most popular custom aggregate function in my toolbox. I use it every day:
There are several ways to do this, but they're basically variations on a theme.
Pseudocode:
A different way that I like a little better is something like this:
Edit: The reason I like the second way of doing it is that each item stands on its own. Using the first approach, if you modified your logic later so that a subsequent item might not get added, you could end up with a stray comma at the end of the string unless you also made your test in the previous item more intelligent, which is dumb.
If you're really concerned about empty strings, use this join function:
Thanks for all of the responses.
It appears that the "proper" answer depends on the context in which the comma separated list is being built. I don't have a neat list of items to use (had to use something for an example...), but I do have an array whose items may or may not be added to the comma seperated list depending on various conditions.
So I chose something to the effect of
As usual, there are numerous methods of doing this. I don't know that any one method deserves more praise or promotion than another. Some are more useful in certain contexts while others satisfy the requirements of different contexts.
Again, thanks to all for your input.
BTW, the original post with the "off the top of my head" code sample is not filtering zero length items, instead it is waiting for the result string to become greater than zero length before adding the comma. Probably not very efficient but I have'nt tested it. Again, it was off the top of my head.